• Care Home
  • Care home

Archived: Pendean Court

Overall: Requires improvement read more about inspection ratings

16 Pendean Court, Barras Cross, Liskeard, Cornwall, PL14 6DZ (01579) 340230

Provided and run by:
Achieve Together Limited

Important: The provider of this service changed. See old profile
Important: The provider of this service changed. See new profile

All Inspections

3 May 2023

During an inspection looking at part of the service

Pendean Court is a residential care home providing personal care for up to 8 adults who have a hearing loss, some of whom may have a learning disability or a physical disability. At the time of the inspection 6 people were living there.

Pendean Court is a detached, single-storey service that is fully wheelchair accessible and adapted to suit the needs of people. Each person has their own en-suite bedroom and access to communal areas and a garden. Pendean Court is situated in Liskeard, Cornwall.

People’s experience of using this service and what we found

We expect health and social care providers to guarantee autistic people and people with a learning disability the choices, dignity, independence, and good access to local communities that most people take for granted. Right Support, right care, right culture is the statutory guidance which supports CQC to make assessments and judgements about services providing support to people with a learning disability and/or autistic people.

The service was not able to demonstrate how they were meeting some of the underpinning principles of “Right Support, Right Care, Right Culture.

Right support:

The service is staffed by a small staff team who know people well. Staffing levels had increased which meant people’s physical care and social needs were now met.

Staff supported people to make choices about their daily lives and engage in activities, that were tailored to their individual needs and promoted their independence. People were supported to maintain and develop relationships.

Staff had attended communication training in British Sign Language and Makaton. This meant staff were able to communicate with people and understood their individual communication needs.

Staff demonstrated an understanding of people's individual care, behavioural and communication needs. This helped ensure people's views were heard and their diverse needs met.

People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible and in their best interests; the policies and systems in the service supported this practice.

Staff were recruited safely. The staff team had the appropriate levels of knowledge and skills to support people and responded to their individual needs and choices. Staff were supported by a system of induction, training, and the re-introduction of supervisions, appraisals and staff meetings.

People received their medicines in a safe way and were protected from abuse and neglect.

Right care:

People and relatives were complimentary about the changes at the service. Comments from people included, “You don’t have to worry about me now” and “I like living here”. Relatives commented, “I have no worries I’m much happier with the care.”

The manager had implemented a new care plan format that included information about people’s individual needs, routines, and preferences. This care plan directed, informed, and guided staff in how to meet a person’s care needs. The manager assured us this care plan format would be introduced for all people they supported.

Other records such as communication plans and risk assessments were also being reviewed to ensure they reflected people’s current communication and care needs.

It was recognised that people’s care needs were being met but records still required improvement.

There was a strong person-centred culture within the staff team. Positive behaviour support plans had been developed for some people, to help staff understand how to support someone in distress, and provided guidance to ensure consistent approaches were used when supporting them.

People received good quality person-centred care that promoted their dignity, privacy, and human rights. Staff were observed talking to people in dignified and respectful way.

Right culture:

The staff at Pendean Court were committed to ensuring people were leading the lives they wanted. Staff created an environment that inspired people to understand and achieve their goals and ambitions.

People led lives that reflected their personalities and preferences because of the ethos, values, attitudes and behaviours of the management and staff. People were treated with dignity, respect, and care.

People, relatives, and staff told us management were approachable and they listened to them when they had any concerns or ideas. All feedback was used to make continuous improvements to the service.

Mental Capacity Act

For more information, please read the detailed findings section of this report. If you are reading this as a separate summary, the full report can be found on the Care Quality Commission (CQC) website at www.cqc.org.uk

We looked at infection prevention and control measures under the Safe key question. We look at this in all care home inspections even if no concerns or risks have been identified. This is to provide assurance that the service can respond to COVID-19 and other infection outbreaks effectively.

Rating at last inspection and update

The last rating for this service was requires improvement (published 10 November 2022). At our last inspection we found breaches of the regulations in relation to governance, communication, activities, and staffing. The provider completed an action plan after the last inspection to tell us what they would do and by when, to improve.

At this inspection, we found the provider remained in breach of a regulation.

Why we inspected

We undertook this targeted inspection to check whether the Warning Notices we previously served in relation to Regulation 17 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014 had been met. The warning notice was served in respect of a lack of oversight of the service. At this inspection we found improvements had been made. However, the provider acknowledged that work to implement further changes, especially in regarding to documentation, remained in progress. We therefore have converted this to a requirement notice.

We also checked whether the Warning Notices we previously served in relation to Regulation 9 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014 had been met. The warning notices were served in respect of a lack of communication and activities. At this inspection we found improvements had been made and the provider was now meeting this regulation.

We also checked if the Requirement Notice we previously served in relation to Regulation 18 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014 had been met. At our last inspection we found the provider had not ensured there were enough suitably qualified, skilled and experienced staff to provide support to people using the service. At this inspection we found improvements had been made and the provider was now meeting this regulation.

The overall rating for the service has not changed following this targeted inspection and remains requires improvement.

You can read the report from our last comprehensive inspection, by selecting the ‘all reports’ link for Pendean Court on our website at www.cqc.org.uk

Enforcement

We have found a breach of regulation in relation to governance at this inspection. Following the inspection managers told us about actions they had taken to mitigate risk.

Please see the action we have told the provider to take at the end of the full version of this report.

Follow up

We will request an action plan from the provider to understand what they will do to improve the standards of quality and safety. We will work alongside the provider and local authority to monitor progress. We will continue to monitor information we receive about the service, which will help inform when we next inspect.

18 August 2022

During a routine inspection

About the service: Pendean Court is a residential care home providing personal care for up to eight adults who have a hearing loss, some of whom may have a learning disability or a physical disability. At the time of the inspection six people were living there.

Pendean Court is a detached, single-storey home that is fully wheelchair accessible

and adapted to suit the needs of the people living at the service. Each person has their own en-suite bedroom and access to communal areas and a garden. Pendean Court is situated in Liskeard, Cornwall.

People’s experience of using this service and what we found

We expect health and social care providers to guarantee autistic people and people with a learning disability the choices, dignity, independence and good access to local communities that most people take for granted. Right Support, right care, right culture is the statutory guidance which supports CQC to make assessments and judgements about services providing support to people with a learning disability and/or autistic people.

The service was not able to demonstrate how they were meeting some of underpinning principles of “Right Support, Right Care, Right Culture.

Right support:

Staff supported people to have choice and control in their everyday lives. Their ability to do this had been impacted by staffing shortages in the service which meant people were not always able to attend planned events and sometimes had to share support. People were not always supported by enough staff on duty who had been trained to do their jobs properly.

Staff did not have access to people’s care plans or communication plans. As staff had no guidance on how to support people or communicate with them effectively, this meant that there was no consistent understanding or approach in how to support people.

Infection control procedures and measures were in place to protect people from infection control risks associated with COVID-19. We were somewhat assured that the provider was using PPE effectively and safely. The head of services provided assurances that staff would follow the national infection control guidelines and wear correct PPE.

People lived in a safe and well-maintained environment which was set up to maximise their independence. The service was close to the centre of town and there was good access to the local community and amenities.

Staff supported people safely with their medicines and worked with health professionals to achieve good health outcomes.

People lived in a home that reflected their personalities, needs and interests. People were supported to maintain and develop relationships.

The provider had effective safeguarding systems in place and staff had an understanding of what to do to help ensure people were protected from the risk of harm or abuse.

People were supported to have some choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible and in their best interests; the policies and systems in the service supported this practice.

Right care:

The service did not have enough appropriately skilled staff to meet people’s needs. The head of services acknowledged there were gaps in training and was attempting to address this.

People using the service had a hearing loss. Prior to the inspection we had received a concern that staff had not received communication training to be able to engage with people in an effective way. the head of service and interim manager acknowledged that this was a concern and were proactively looking at ways to resource training.

People using the service told us they felt they were cared for by skilled staff who were caring and respectful. We observed many kind and caring interactions between staff and people. Staff protected and respected people’s privacy and dignity. They understood and responded to their individual needs.

Right culture:

Staff told us that due to the inconsistent leadership at the service they felt the service had been “leadership less”. It had also impacted on the support and training that staff received and on the operation of the service.

Staffing levels had impacted on the interim managers availability to ensure that managerial tasks were completed. Feedback from staff, and the review of records and care documentation evidenced there was poor oversight of the service which was affecting aspects of the operations of the service. Audits to oversee the service were not always fully effective in identifying areas for improvement.

The provider had introduced an electronic care and record system which staff had difficulty accessing. The provider had failed to ensure that systems were effective to support staff in their work.

The service sought the views and opinions of people using the service, staff and professionals. Staff team meetings were held regularly and provided opportunities for staff and the interim manager to discuss any issues or proposed changes within the service.

For more information, please read the detailed findings section of this report. If you are reading this as a separate summary, the full report can be found on the Care Quality Commission (CQC) website at www.cqc.org.uk

This service was registered with us on 30 June 2021 and this is the first inspection. The last rating for the service under the previous provider was good, published on 26 March 2019.

Why we inspected

This was the first inspection since the provider registered with the commission.

We looked at infection prevention and control measures under the Safe key question. We look at this in all care home inspections even if no concerns or risks have been identified. This is to provide assurance that the service can respond to COVID-19 and other infection outbreaks effectively.

Enforcement

We are mindful of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on our regulatory function. This meant we took account of the exceptional circumstances arising as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic when considering what enforcement action was necessary and proportionate to keep people safe as a result of this inspection. We will continue to monitor the service and will take further action if needed.

We have found breaches in relation to staffing, lack of communication and activities and oversight of the service at this inspection. Following the inspection managers told us about actions they had taken to mitigate risk.

Please see the action we have told the provider to take at the end of this report. We have told the provider when improvements are needed to be made by.

Follow up

We will request an action plan from the provider to understand what they will do to improve the standards of quality and safety. We will work alongside the provider and local authority to monitor progress. We will continue to monitor information we receive about the service, which will help inform when we next inspect.