17 June 2013
During a routine inspection
The premises were safe and met the needs of the people living in the home.
People's social needs were generally met.One person's representative told us they, 'Mostly we can go out when I see him and staff are available to come with us. Sometimes not, when staff have not checked the diary and rotas properly.'
We saw that the leadership in the home had not ensured that records reflected the care people received monitored people's welfare and ensured that concerns were highlighted and addressed.
The service provided was not sufficiently well structured to ensure that the people were supported to develop their skills and move onto more independent living. This meant that people had stayed in the home longer than had been planned.
A quality monitoring system had been put in place to assess the quality of the service being provided but was not robust enough to identify the issues we found. The views of people were being gathered but concerns identified by people were not followed up quickly so that they were addressed and people felt that they were listened to.