• Doctor
  • Independent doctor

BS Plastic Surgery Ltd Also known as Ministry of Aesthetics

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

33 Newton Road, Torquay, TQ2 5DB

Provided and run by:
BS Plastic Surgery Ltd

Report from 12 January 2024 assessment

On this page

Effective

Good

Updated 5 July 2024

People’s needs were assessed and their wishes central to the care, support and treatment they received. Staff worked with people and partner services to coordination care and improve their experiences of services. Staff learnt from practices and refines systems to improve patient outcomes.

This service scored 75 (out of 100) for this area. Find out what we look at when we assess this area and How we calculate these scores.

Assessing needs

Score: 3

We did not look at Assessing needs during this assessment. The score for this quality statement is based on the previous rating for Effective.

Delivering evidence-based care and treatment

Score: 3

There were established and effective systems and processes in place for staff to learn, continuously improve and innovate. The provider conducted clinical audits to check staff adherence to best practice and national guidance. The provider monitored patient outcome and their data showed people’s expectations were consistently met and their experience was positive.

How staff, teams and services work together

Score: 3

We did not look at How staff, teams and services work together during this assessment. The score for this quality statement is based on the previous rating for Effective.

Supporting people to live healthier lives

Score: 3

We did not look at Supporting people to live healthier lives during this assessment. The score for this quality statement is based on the previous rating for Effective.

Monitoring and improving outcomes

Score: 3

We did not look at Monitoring and improving outcomes during this assessment. The score for this quality statement is based on the previous rating for Effective.

All staff had completed training on the Mental Capacity Act.

Consent to care and treatment was obtained from people in line with legislation and guidance. People were provided information on treatments, potential risks and adverse effects, realistic outcomes and cost implications. Procedures were conducted after they had received 14 days to consider the information and confirm their intention to proceed. Peoples consent was sought prior to sharing any details of their consultation or medicines prescribed with third parties such as their GP. The clinician discussed the risks and benefits of any treatment during the consultations together with realistic outcomes and the costs involved.