Background to this inspection
Updated
21 August 2018
We carried out this inspection under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 as part of our regulatory functions. This inspection was planned to check whether the provider is meeting the legal requirements and regulations associated with the Health and Social Care Act 2008, to look at the overall quality of the service, and to provide a rating for the service under the Care Act 2014.
This inspection took place on 23 and 24 July 2018 and was announced. The inspection was completed by one inspector. The provider was given 48 hours' notice because the location provides a domiciliary care service and we needed to be sure that the registered provider and their staff would be available.
We checked the information we held about the service and the provider. This included notifications that the provider had sent to us about incidents at the service and information that we had received from the public. We used this information to formulate our inspection plan.
We also used information the provider sent us in the Provider Information Return. This is information we require providers to send us at least once annually to give some key information about the service, what the service does well and improvements they plan to make.
We spoke by telephone with two people who used the service and two relatives. We also spoke with three members of care staff, the care coordinator and the registered manager.
We looked at the care records for three people to see if they were accurate and up to date. In addition, we looked at audits completed by the service, in relation to reviews and medicine management. We also looked at recruitment folders for four staff to ensure the quality of the service was continuously monitored and reviewed to drive improvement.
Updated
21 August 2018
The inspection took place on 23 and 24 July 2018 and was unannounced. This is the first comprehensive inspection of this location.
This service provides a range of services to the NHS and adult social care settings. They also provide some domiciliary care packages, these are provided to older adults and younger adults living with a range of health conditions and needs to live independently in the community. Not everyone using Precedo receives regulated activity; CQC only inspects the service being received by people provided with 'personal care'; help with tasks related to personal hygiene and eating. Where they do, we also take into account any wider social care provided. At the time of our inspection, three people were receiving personal care as part of their care package.
Prescedo has a registered manager. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.
People received a service which was safe. We saw that staff understood how to keep people safe and knew how to report any concerns. Risk assessments had been completed to cover all aspects of people’s care, including whilst outside their home. The staff were consistent and the appropriate recruitment checks had been completed. Staff knew how to handle medicine safety and to reduce the risks of infection.
Staff had received training for their role. This involved a range of courses and the latest guidance on specific conditions. When people received support with meals this was done through choice and dietary needs. Health care was monitored and people were supported in this area. People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible; the policies and systems in the service supported this practice.
Staff had established positive relationships with people and this was supported by having consistent staff. Respect and dignity had been maintained along with supporting people to remain as independent as they were able to be.
There was a responsive approach to people’s needs. The hours of support were flexible to meet the needs on a week by week basis. The care plans were detailed and included information in relation to people’s equality needs and information access. There had been no complaints to the service, however people felt able to raise any concerns.
The service was supported by a registered manager who understand the regulations and ensured we received notifications and information in relation to these. People had been given the opportunity to reflect on the service they received and to support improvements driving forward. Regular audits had been carried out in relation to the care plans and medicines management. Staff felt supported and enjoyed working for this provider. Partnerships had been established to support the needs of peoples making the links with health and social care professionals.