When we visited the service on 25 April 2014, we gathered evidence against the outcomes we inspected to help answer our five key questions: Is the service caring? Is the service responsive? Is the service safe? Is the service effective? Is the service well led? We further gathered information from people and their relatives who used the service and from staff who worked at the serviceBelow is a summary of what we found. The summary is based on our review of records, observations during the inspection, speaking with people and their relatives who used the service and speaking with staff who supported the people who used the service.
If you want to see the evidence supporting our summary please read our full report.
We found people expressed their views and were involved in making decisions about their care, treatment and support. They experienced effective, safe and appropriate care. These were a few of the quotes people used to describe the care and support they received. 'I can't fault the place and the girls are very good.' 'We do have choice here'. 'The staff are tolerant and very patient'. 'I am so happy my relative is here'.
We observed the lunchtime meal and saw the food was laid out on people's plates in an appetising way. People we spoke with told us, 'the food is very good and they got enough food and drink'. We saw that people were encouraged to make choices about their meal even though the menu displayed had not offered any choice. We saw two different protein choices (fish cake and fried fish) had been provided by the cook.
Generally, people had their medicines at the times they needed them from staff qualified to do so. On the day of our visit we saw medicines being administered late. We were told this was because there was a medical emergency which the registered nurse had to deal with before they were able to commence the administration of medicines.
People and their relatives spoke highly of the care they received and the cleanliness of the service. We observed the service had a number of domestic staff on duty carrying out cleaning throughout the service. We noted the staff wore suitable protective clothing including gloves. We saw the laundry was clean, well-appointed with receiving area(soiled and used laundry) and clean area (for clean laundry). Laundry and domestic staff were knowledgeable about infection control. We saw the service had appointed a company experienced in waste disposal and waste was collected on a regular basis.
The service had appropriate systems in place to effectively assess and monitor the quality of the service.
The five questions we ask about services and what we found.
Is the service safe?
People who used the service told us they were treated with respect and dignity. For example, one person said, 'When I am being assisted with my care needs, the carers informed me of what they were going to do before undertaking the task'.
We observed the service had a system in place to ensure that people's risk assessments were kept under regular review. Any trends identified were dealt with to minimise risks relating to people's health, welfare and safety.
All seven members of staff spoken to were able to describe what measures the service had in place to promote people's safety and how they would protect people if they felt their human rights were being breached.
The service had processes in place to ensure that staff who administered medicines had suitable training to enable them to handle medicines safely, securely and appropriately.
We saw documented evidence that the service used a range of quality monitoring tools such as review of risk assessments, care plans reviews, staff supervision and appraisals. They also used a yearly clients and staff satisfaction surveys to measure the quality of care and support people received from the service. People told us they felt safe with the staff.
Is the service effective?
We found that people's care plans provided detailed information on how they wished to be supported with their care needs. For example, resident X needed the help of two members of staff to mobilise safely. We observed that people's daily care record sheets included the date and what help and support was offered to the person. Care staff spoken with told us they used the daily record sheet to highlight any changes to the person's care to ensure continuity of care. We saw that these were appropriately maintained to ensure if required a new member of staff would be able to deliver care safely and effectively.
Care staff told us they had regular supervisions and appraisals to ensure they are competent to deliver effective care to people who used the service. We saw documented evidence of staff appraisals which had been carried out by the registered manager and or the supervisor. We saw records of staff training which demonstrated care staff had regular and appropriate training to enable them to meet the care needs of people who used the service.
We found that people's health care needs were kept under regular review. They had access to health care professionals such as the GP, dentist, optician and chiropodist. This meant that people were supported to keep healthy and well.
Is the service caring?
People told us that care staff spoke to them in a kind and respectful manner. One person said, 'The staff all of them demonstrates a genuine affection, care and concern to me'. All four members of care staff spoken with were knowledgeable about people's care needs including their preferences and personal histories. It was evident that people were listened to and care staff responded to them in a positive and caring way. One person said, 'I feel I receive excellent care'.
Is the service responsive?
The six people we spoke with told us they were supported to express their views and be actively involved in making decisions about their care, treatment and support. In the care plans and daily record sheets we looked at we saw evidence which reflected that people received individual care as laid out in their care plans. We saw planned activities advertised which was age related and suitable for people at the service.
We were told by a senior member of staff that the service had not received any complaints since the last inspection. People we spoke with all said they knew how to make a complaint, but have never done so. They said they discussed their care needs with the member of care staff and they worked well together so there was never any need to complain.
Is the service well led?
Staff spoken with said that they felt supported by the management team and were in regular contact with the registered manager and or deputy manager. They were able to raise questions relating to the delivery and implementation of best practice on the spot. They told us they have had one to one supervisions and yearly appraisals. This meant that staff felt supported and well-led.
We found that the service had quality assurance systems in place. Staff practice had been regularly observed. The outcomes from these were discussed and used to improve the care provided. Staff spoken with said that they were provided with adequate training. This enabled them to perform their roles and to be accountable for their actions.
People spoken with told us the registered manager is always available in the home. They said either the registered manager or the deputy manager made regular visits to the lounge and their bedrooms to check if they are happy with the care and if the care workers were performing satisfactory. This ensured people received agreed and effective care.
The service had arrangements in place to monitor complaints, accidents and incidents. This meant that lessons were learnt from mistakes, incidents and complaints investigations to ensure improvements with the service delivery was maintained.