• Doctor
  • Independent doctor

Daffodil Aesthetics

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

14-16 Wortley Road, High Green, Sheffield, S35 4LU

Provided and run by:
Daffodil Aesthetics

All Inspections

6 July 2023

During a monthly review of our data

We carried out a review of the data available to us about Daffodil Aesthetics on 6 July 2023. We have not found evidence that we need to carry out an inspection or reassess our rating at this stage.

This could change at any time if we receive new information. We will continue to monitor data about this service.

If you have concerns about Daffodil Aesthetics, you can give feedback on this service.

30 November 2022

During a routine inspection

This service is rated as Good overall.

The key questions are rated as:

Are services safe? – Good

Are services effective? – Good

Are services caring? – Good

Are services responsive? – Good

Are services well-led? – Good

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at Daffodil Aesthetics as part of our inspection programme of a new provider registration for the service. This was a first rated inspection for the service that was registered with the Care Quality Commission (CQC) in February 2022.

This service is registered with CQC under the Health and Social Care Act 2008 in respect of some, but not all, of the services it provides. There are some exemptions from regulation by CQC which relate to particular types of regulated activities and services and these are set out in Schedule 1 and Schedule 2 of The Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014. Daffodil Aesthetics provides a range of non-surgical cosmetic interventions, for example dermal filler injections which are not within CQC scope of registration. Therefore, we did not inspect or report on these services.

The registered provider for the service is Daffodil Aesthetics who provides treatments privately to fee paying clients. The registered provider has a legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

We reviewed feedback received by the provider on their booking system, comment cards from patients who had used the service and feedback received by us.

Our key findings were:

  • The provider organised and delivered services to meet patients’ needs following best practice guidelines.
  • Staff were appropriately trained to be able to deliver a safe service in a clean environment.
  • The provider had systems and processes for monitoring and managing risks.
  • The provider was proud of the work they did and of the quality of service they provided.
  • Services were offered on a private fee paying basis only and were accessible to people who chose to use it.
  • There was a clear strategy and vision to promote good quality care.

The areas where the provider should make improvements are:

  • Review systems and arrangements for storing and documentation of medicines.

Dr Sean O’Kelly BSc MB ChB MSc DCH FRCA

Chief Inspector of Hospitals and Interim Chief Inspector of Primary Medical Services