The Care Quality Commission
  • Doctor
  • Independent doctor

The Mole Clinic

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

9 Argyll Street, London, W1F 7TG

Provided and run by:
The Mole Clinic Limited

All Inspections

6 July 2023

During a monthly review of our data

We carried out a review of the data available to us about The Mole Clinic on 6 July 2023. We have not found evidence that we need to carry out an inspection or reassess our rating at this stage.

This could change at any time if we receive new information. We will continue to monitor data about this service.

If you have concerns about The Mole Clinic, you can give feedback on this service.

15 June 2022

During a routine inspection

This service is rated as Good overall. (Previous inspection: 14 June 2018 - Unrated).

The key questions are rated as:

Are services safe? – Good

Are services effective? – Good

Are services caring? – Good

Are services responsive? – Good

Are services well-led? – Good

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at The Mole Clinic as part of our inspection programme.

The service provides skin cancer screening, diagnosis and skin lesion and mole removal. All tissue samples were sent to a local laboratory for analysis.

The clinic manager is the registered manager. A registered manager is a person who is registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

For reasons of safety and infection prevention and control related to the COVID-19 pandemic, we did not commission patient feedback with CQC comment cards. We did not speak to any patients during this inspection.

Our key findings were:

  • There were clear systems and processes to safeguard patients from abuse. All staff had received training appropriate to their role.
  • There was evidence of quality improvement activity.
  • Consultations were comprehensive and undertaken in a professional manner.
  • Consent procedures were in place and these were in line with legal requirements.
  • There was an infection prevention and control policy and procedures were in place to reduce the risk and spread of infection.
  • Staff members were knowledgeable and had the experience and skills required to carry out their roles.
  • Clinical records were detailed and held securely. The service did not keep paper records. The clinical system used by the clinic enabled diagnostic imaging to be shared quickly with specialist doctors.
  • The clinic held regular clinical management meetings and multi-disciplinary team meetings. Minutes were available to all staff via the clinic intranet.
  • The service had systems to manage and learn from complaints or significant events. These were shared with the wider organisation and analysed for trends.
  • Patients were able to book appointments online and by telephone. The service monitored the availability of appointments to ensure urgent referrals were seen in a timely manner.
  • Patients were asked for feedback following each appointment. This feedback was logged, analysed and shared with staff via the clinic intranet.
  • All staff were aware of the clinic’s values and were passionate about providing high level care. We saw that staff were committed to raising awareness of skin cancers and sun safety.
  • The clinic had developed a training course for skin cancer screening that was undertaken by all the nursing staff. This was the only course of this nature that had been accredited by the Royal College of Nursing.

The areas where the provider should make improvements are:

  • Carry out regular prescribing audits.
  • Review a legionella risk assessment and carry out regular water temperature checks.
  • Implement a formal process to review and monitor the performance of consultants.

Dr Sean O’Kelly BSc MB ChB MSc DCH FRCA

Chief Inspector of Hospitals and Interim Chief Inspector of Primary Medical Services

14 June 2018

During a routine inspection

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection of The Mole Clinic on 14 June 2018 to ask the service the following key questions; Are services safe, effective, caring, responsive and well-led?

Our findings were:

Are services safe?

We found that this service was providing safe care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services effective?

We found that this service was providing effective care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services caring?

We found that this service was providing caring services in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services responsive?

We found that this service was providing responsive care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services well-led?

We found that this service was providing well-led care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

We carried out this inspection under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 as part of our regulatory functions. This inspection was planned to check whether the service was meeting the legal requirements and regulations associated with the Health and Social Care Act 2008.

This service was inspected in December 2012 under our previous inspection methodology and it was found at that time to be meeting all the essential standards of care.

The Mole Clinic, established in 2003, is a clinical location of the provider The Mole Clinic Limited and operates from 9 Argyll Street, London W1F 7TG, which is registered as its head office. The service also operates from a separately registered location at 7 Moorgate, London EC2R 6AF. Operational systems and processes are generic to both locations and employed staff worked across both sites. We inspected both locations on the same day with two separate inspection teams.

The service specialises in skin cancer screening, diagnosis and skin lesion removal. All services are offered from both locations. Staff from Argyll Street also provide skin cancer screening sessions at two satellite locations based within Harrods Pharmacy, Brompton Road, London SW1X 7XL and at 40 Bank Street, Canary Wharf, London E14 5NR. We did not inspect either satellite location.

The day-to-day running of the service at both Argyll Street and Moorgate is provided by the clinic manager supported by a clinic coordinator at both locations. The service also employs seven nurses, two healthcare assistants, a systems and data manager and a receptionist. Skin lesion diagnosis using digital images (tele-dermatology) is provided remotely by three sessional dermatology-specialist general practitioners. Mole removal surgery is provided on-site by five surgical consultants in the specialities of dermatology, plastic surgery and general surgery, all of whom work under practising privileges (the granting of practising privileges is a well-established process within independent healthcare whereby a medical practitioner is granted permission to work in an independent hospital or clinic, in independent private practice, or within the provision of community services). 

The service offers pre-bookable face-to-face appointments for adults aged 18 and over. Patients can access appointments at this location on Monday and Wednesday from 8am to 7pm, Tuesday, Thursday and Friday from 8am to 5pm and Saturday from 10am to 4pm. Appointments at Harrods Pharmacy are available on Wednesday from 10am to 7pm and at Canary Wharf Monday to Friday from 8.30am to 5.30pm. For the period 1 June 2017 to 31 May 2018 the service has seen approximately 8,200 patients seen at Argyll Street, 300 at the Harrods Pharmacy location and 103 at its Canary Wharf location. Overall in the past year the service has seen approximately 13,000 patients at all its locations.

The provider is registered with the Care Quality Commission (CQC) for the regulated activities of Diagnostic & Screening Procedures and Surgical Procedures. After the inspection the service submitted an application to add the regulated activity Treatment of Disease, Disorder or Injury to reflect its current service provision.

The clinic manager is the registered manager. A registered manager is a person who is registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

As part of our inspection, we asked for CQC comments cards to be completed by patients prior to our inspection. Eighteen comments cards were completed, all of which were positive about the service experienced. Patients commented that the service offered a professional, caring and thorough service. Patients said staff were friendly, helpful and informative.

Our key findings were:

  • There were systems in place to safeguard children and vulnerable adults from abuse and staff we spoke with knew how to identify and report safeguarding concerns. All staff had been trained to a level appropriate to their role.
  • The service had systems to manage risk so that safety incidents were less likely to happen. When incidents did happen, the service learned from them and improved their processes.
  • The practice carried out staff checks on recruitment, including checks of professional registration where relevant.
  • Clinical staff we spoke with were aware of current evidence-based guidance and they had the skills, knowledge and experience to carry out their roles.
  • There was evidence of quality improvement, including clinical audit.
  • Consent procedures were in place and these were in line with legal requirements.
  • Staff we spoke with were aware of their responsibility to respect people’s diversity and human rights. The service was caring, person-centred and compassionate.
  • Systems were in place to protect personal information about patients. The service was registered with the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO).
  • Patients were able to access care and treatment from the clinic within an appropriate timescale for their needs.
  • Information about services and how to complain was available.
  • The service had proactively gathered feedback from patients.
  • Governance arrangements were in place. There were clear responsibilities, roles and systems of accountability to support good governance and management.

There were areas where the provider could make improvements and should

  • Consider the infection prevention and control lead undertaking enhanced training to support them in this extended role.
  • Review practice policies and procedures so they are consistently service-specific.

17 December 2012

During a routine inspection

We were not able to speak to any people using the service provided by the Mole Clinic. This was because during our visit the people attending appointments at the clinic told us that they had no time to spare. Staff requested feedback from all the people who received a service. We looked at the client survey responses from 14/12/2011 to 17/12/2012. The responses ranged from good to excellent.

27 September 2011

During a routine inspection

We were not able to speak to people who use services on this occasion. The visit was announced to ensure that we could speak to the managing director and the nurse practitioners so that we would not interrupt the clinic's appointment schedule. We saw evidence through patient satisfaction survey reports that people were satisfied with the services but were unable to speak to them during our visit.