Background to this inspection
Updated
9 September 2020
We carried out this inspection under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 as part of our regulatory functions. This inspection was planned to check whether the provider is meeting the legal requirements and regulations associated with the Health and Social Care Act 2008.
This was a targeted inspection looking at the infection control and prevention measures the provider has in place. As part of CQC’s response to the coronavirus pandemic we are conducting a thematic review of infection control and prevention measures in care homes.
This inspection took place on 13 August 2020 and was announced. The service was selected to take part in this thematic review which is seeking to identify examples of good practice in infection prevention and control.
Updated
9 September 2020
About the service: Stoneygate Oaklands is a residential care home that was providing personal care to 42 people at the time of the inspection.
This service was selected to be part of our national review, looking at the quality of oral health care support for people living in care homes. The inspection team included a dental inspector who looked in detail at how well the service supported people with their oral health. This includes support with oral hygiene and access to dentists. We will publish our national report of our findings and recommendations in 2019.
People’s experience of using this service:
People told us they felt safe living at Stoneygate Oaklands.
The risks to people had been assessed and people and where appropriate their relatives had been involved in compiling care plans. Staff were knowledgeable about the range of needs people had. People were supported with their medicines in a safe way.
Appropriate recruitment checks had been carried out to ensure staff were suitable to work at the service. Training relevant to people’s support had been undertaken by staff. The staff team felt involved in the running of the home and were supported by the registered manager.
People accessed healthcare services when they needed them, and they were supported to eat and drink enough to remain healthy.
People were involved in making decisions about their care and support and their consent about the care and services offered was obtained. People were supported by a staff team who were kind and caring and treated them in a considerate and respectful manner.
There were systems in place to monitor the quality and safety of the service being provided. People’s views of the service were sought through regular meetings, surveys and informal chats. A complaints procedure was in place and people knew what to do if they had a concern of any kind.
The manager understood their roles and responsibilities as a registered person. They worked in partnership with other agencies to ensure people received care and support that was consistent with their assessed needs.
More information can be found in the detailed findings below.
Rating at last inspection: The home was rated Good at the last inspection in 2016.
Why we inspected: This inspection was planned in line with our regulatory framework and took place within the specified period since the last inspection.
Follow up: We will continue to provide ongoing monitoring of this service.