• Care Home
  • Care home

Mansard House

Overall: Outstanding read more about inspection ratings

28 Watling Street Road, Fulwood, Preston, Lancashire, PR2 8DY (01772) 774219

Provided and run by:
Potensial Limited

All Inspections

6 July 2023

During a monthly review of our data

We carried out a review of the data available to us about Mansard House on 6 July 2023. We have not found evidence that we need to carry out an inspection or reassess our rating at this stage.

This could change at any time if we receive new information. We will continue to monitor data about this service.

If you have concerns about Mansard House, you can give feedback on this service.

15 February 2018

During a routine inspection

The Inspection took place on 15 February 2018 and it was unannounced. At the last inspection on 22 June 2015, the service was rated good overall with an outstanding rating for responsive. At this inspection the service was rated as outstanding overall with all five domains also being rated as outstanding.

Mansard House is a 'care home'. People in care homes receive accommodation and or personal care as a single package under one contractual agreement. CQC regulates both the premises and the care provided and both were looked at during this inspection.

The service is registered to care for up to ten adults who have mental health conditions, a learning disability or autistic spectrum disorder. There were ten people who lived at Mansard House when we inspected, who had mental health conditions.

There was a registered manager in post, who was present at the time of our inspection. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are 'registered persons'. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

Mansard House is a three storey dwelling located in a residential area of Preston close to the city centre. All bedrooms are of single occupancy with en-suite facilities. These are tastefully decorated and furnished to meet the needs and wishes of each individual who lives at the home. The communal areas are pleasant and well maintained. Public transport links are within easy reach and on road parking is permitted directly outside the home. A variety of amenities are within easy reach, such as pubs, shops, supermarkets, churches, a post office, leisure centre and newsagents.

The regulated activity for this service is accommodation for persons who require nursing or personal care. However, nursing care is not provided at Mansard House.

We found recruitment practices to be robust. In-depth induction programmes were provided for all new employees and a wide range of training modules were available for the staff team, many of which were essential components of individual learning and development plans. Training was also provided specifically around the needs of people who lived in Mansard House. Staff members we spoke with were knowledgeable about the needs of those in their care.

Records showed the staff team completed an exceptionally wide range of mandatory training modules and this was confirmed by staff members we spoke with. Regular supervision sessions and annual appraisals enabled members of the workforce to discuss their personal development and training needs with their line manager.

The home had introduced a well-researched and evidence based system for the planning of people’s support. This produced exceptionally detailed assessments of people’s needs, which had been completed before a placement was arranged. The planning of people’s care and support was extremely person centred, providing staff with clear guidance about people’s needs and how these needs were to be best met.

Records showed that individuals were empowered and fully involved in making decisions about how they wished to live. Risk assessments had been completed, which were detailed and outlined the best course of action, in order to reduce the level of potential risk. This helped to protect people from harm.

The home had introduced creative ways of supporting people with healthy eating and with learning independent living skills, such as meal planning, food shopping, cooking and computer skills. This helped those who lived at Mansard House to prepare for their future, when they were able to step down from residential care and support.

We found that people’s dignity was consistently promoted and their privacy was always respected. Staff members approached those who lived at Mansard House in an extremely kind, gentle and friendly manner. They were polite, compassionate and committed. People were supported to maintain their independence and were relaxed and comfortable in the presence of staff. They spoke extremely positively about the service and how staff had made them feel empowered and fully motivated to succeed in reaching their goals.

People were supported to express their views and supported to access advocacy services, should they wish to do so. An advocate is an independent person, who will act on behalf of those needing support to make decisions.

The staff team were confident in reporting any concerns about a person’s safety or wellbeing. Mental capacity assessments had been conducted for all those who lived at the home, which determined that no-one lacked the capacity to make any decisions and everyone was able to ‘come and go’ as they pleased, without any restrictions being placed on their freedom.

People had been supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible; the policies and systems in the service supported this practice.

Equality, diversity and human rights were consistently considered and strategies implemented to promote anti-discriminatory practices. We observed the daily routines and practices within the home and found people were treated equally and their human rights were constantly being respected.

People told us they felt safe living at Mansard House. Their human rights were properly recognised, respected and promoted. Accident records were appropriately maintained and these were kept in line with data protection guidelines. There was a detailed record of the actions taken and included lessons learned to reduce the potential of any future risks.

A contingency plan provided staff with clear guidance about what they needed to do in the event of an environmental emergency, such as power failure or severe weather conditions. Systems and equipment within the home had been serviced to ensure they were safe and fit for use.

People received their medicines in a safe manner. Detailed medication audits were in place and staff had completed training, as well as regular competency assessments.

Clinical waste was being disposed of appropriately and infection control practices were good. The home was found to be safe. People were involved in meal planning, shopping and cooking. They were able to eat whatever they preferred, although healthy eating was also encouraged. A range of bespoke individual activities were provided and outings to local places of interest were arranged.

We found that Mansard House was constantly striving to improve and to look for innovative and creative ways to move the service forward. We found many distinctive characteristics of ‘outstanding’ evident. This was echoed by the consistent positive comments from those who lived at the home, the staff team and external professionals, of which feedback was sought from a considerable number. Evidence was also available to show the home maintained sustainability over long periods of time and had continued to make positive developments in all domains.

22/06/2015

During a routine inspection

Mansard House is a three storey dwelling located in a residential area of Preston close to the city centre. Care and support is provided for a maximum of ten younger adults with mental health conditions, learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder. All bedrooms are of single occupancy with en-suite facilities. The service can also provide care and support for people in their own homes, to help them remain independent, once they have moved on from Mansard House.

Pleasant communal areas are available, which are well decorated and well maintained. Public transport is available from outside the home. On road parking is permitted and a variety of amenities are within easy reach, such as a post office, pubs, shops, supermarkets, churches, a leisure centre and newsagents.

The regulated activities for this service are, ‘Accommodation for persons who require nursing or personal care’ and ‘Personal care’. However, Mansard House does not provide nursing care. Mansard House is designed to accommodate and provide care and support for adults who have a learning disability, autistic spectrum disorder or mental health disorders. The level of people’s needs vary from those who are quite independent and are being supported to be self-sufficient to those who require a great amount of support and care intervention. The last inspection of this service was conducted on 15th April 2014, under a pilot scheme to test the new inspection process. There were no issues identified at that time.

This comprehensive inspection was unannounced and was conducted on 22 June 2015.

The registered manager was on duty on the day of our inspection. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated regulations about how the service is run.

We found recruitment practices to be robust. In-depth induction programmes were provided for all new employees and a wide range of training modules were available for the staff team, many of which were essential components of individual learning and development plans. Staff members we spoke with were knowledgeable about the needs of those in their care.

Detailed assessments of people’s needs had been completed before a placement was arranged at Mansard House and the planning of people’s care and support was person centred, providing staff with clear guidance about the needs of those who lived at the home and how these needs were to be best met. Records showed that individuals were empowered and fully involved in making decisions about how they wished to live. Risk assessments had been conducted, which were detailed and outlined the best course of action, in order to reduce the level of potential risk. This helped to protect people from harm.

We found that people’s dignity was consistently promoted and their privacy was always respected. Staff members approached those who lived at Mansard House in a kind, gentle and friendly manner. People were supported to maintain their independence as much as possible and were relaxed and comfortable. They spoke very positively about the service and how staff had made them feel empowered and motivated to succeed in reaching their goals.

People were supported to express their views and were able to access advocacy services, should they wish to do so. An advocate is an independent person, who will act on behalf of those needing support to make decisions.

The staff team were confident in reporting any concerns about a person’s safety in relation to the Mental Capacity Act 2015 (MCA) and Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS). Mental capacity assessments had been conducted for all those who lived at the home, which determined that no-one lacked the capacity to make any decisions and everyone was able to ‘come and go’ as they pleased, without any undue restrictions being placed on their freedom.

People told us they felt safe living at Mansard House. Their human rights were properly recognised, respected and promoted. Accident records were appropriately maintained and these were kept in line with data protection guidelines. A contingency plan provided staff with guidance about what they needed to do in the event of an environmental emergency, such as power failure or severe weather conditions. Systems and equipment within the home had been serviced to ensure they were safe and fit for use.

People received their medicines in a safe manner, although we did discuss some minor issues with the registered manager, which were addressed immediately. Medication audits were in place. However, these could have been more streamlined, so that minor issues could be identified and rectified at an early stage.

Clinical waste was being disposed of appropriately and infection control practices were good. The home was found to be safe. Food served was tasty, nutritious and plentiful. A range of individual activities were provided and outings to local places of interest were arranged.

We found that Mansard House had many of the characteristics of ‘outstanding’, which was echoed in the consistent comments from those who lived at the home, relatives, staff and external professionals of which feedback was sought from a considerable number. Evidence was also available to show that the home maintained sustainability over long periods of time in many areas.

15/04/2014

During a routine inspection

Mansard House provides care and support for a maximum of ten people with mental health needs, learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder. At the time of our visit there were nine people who lived there. The service also provides care and support to people in their own homes, to help them remain independent, once they have moved on from Mansard House.

There is an established registered manager in place.  A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service and shares the legal responsibility for meeting the requirements of the law with the provider.

During our visit we saw staff understood people’s needs and had developed a caring and supportive relationship with them. People spoke very positively about the service and how staff had made them feel empowered and motivated to succeed in reaching their goals.

Throughout our visit we saw examples of where the registered manager and staff had tried innovative methods to offer practical solutions to meet people’s support needs. People were consistently involved in making decisions about all areas of their support. We saw their individual files included appropriate and thorough risk assessments and care records. We noted the service had documentation in place to support ‘positive risk taking.’ Support plans were regularly reviewed to ensure people’s changing needs were met.

We looked at how the service was being staffed and reviewed staff training and supervision. We saw there were sufficient staff on each shift with a range of skills and experience. Staff told us they felt supported, had regular meetings with their manager, and their training was kept up to date.

Suitable arrangements were in place to protect people from the risk of abuse. People told us they felt safe. The service had safeguards in place for people who may be unable to make decisions about their care and support.

We found there were good systems and processes in place to monitor the quality of the service being provided. The registered manager consistently assessed and monitored the quality of care and actively sought ways to incorporate best practice in order to provide people who need care and support with high quality services. We saw that best practice guidance was implemented and followed by staff.

16 September 2013

During a routine inspection

Some people living at Mansard House were unable to give us verbatim comments about what life was like at the home. However, those we were able to speak with all provided us with positive comments. People told us they were able to make choices about how they lived and what they wanted to do. They told us their needs were being met by a kind and caring staff team and that they felt safe living at Mansard House. We noted that those living at the home looked comfortable in the presence of staff members.

Comments received included:

"The staff are lovely."

"It's a nice place, a friendly atmosphere and the staff are 'spot on', really good. We have things to do here. There's the stables, a college course, Grange Gardens, Fulwood Leisure Centre."

"I go to Dad's on a Wednesday night, my sisters on Thursday afternoon and my mum's on a Saturday morning. I can go out any time during the day."

During our inspection we assessed standards relating to care and welfare and how people were supported to be involved in the planning of their own care. We also looked at the management of medications and how complaints were dealt with. We did not identify any concerns in any of the outcome areas we assessed.

23 April 2012

During a routine inspection

We spoke with several people who lived at Mansard House during our visit to this location. All the comments we received were positive. People told us their privacy and dignity was always promoted and they were able to make choices about how they lived and what they wanted to do. They told us their needs were being met and they felt safe living at Mansard House.

Comments received included:

"This is not a service, it is a proper home for everyone who lives here."

"The atmosphere is so relaxed. No-one tells us what we have to do. It's brill."

"I went to ASDA with the staff last week to do the food shop and for four days we got a massive trolley of food. It is always good quality. None of your cheap rubbish. There is always plenty to eat. We can just help ourselves to anything whenever we want. We never go hungry."

"I have been in a lot of care places over the years, but this is the best yet."

10, 28 March 2011

During a routine inspection

We talked to people who receive support and care and spoke with a family member. We asked people about their views about the service and the care and support staff provide. People said the service was 'The best place I've ever been in. You do what you want.'; 'A place I would recommend anyone to live' and 'I think this place is top notch, the best place I've ever lived in'.

The people we spoke to told us they were very happy with the support provided. They told us that, 'Staff are just nice, listen to me and know me well' and 'trusted staff to put things right'. Staff was described as good listeners and more like a family than paid carers. A relative we spoke to said of the service 'The service is stunning in what it does'.

People told us they had been included in agreeing the care to be provided by the service. People said they new what was written in their support plans so staff knew how to support them.

People told us they felt safe living at the home. They said they knew who they could speak to if they had a concern or complaint.