Newday Healthcare Professionals Limited provides care services to people within their own home. Care services include personal care, a sitting service and domestic services. The service provided are either through private arrangement or social services funding. The service covers Southend on Sea and Essex and at the time of our inspection, the service was providing support to 17 people in their own homes, all in the Southend on Sea area. The service was first registered with the Care Quality Commission on the 6 June 2014.This inspection took place on the 10,13, 14 October 2016 and 01 November 2016 which was announced, the inspection team consisted of two inspectors the first day and one inspector on three days that followed.
The service was last inspected in June 2016 where the Commission highlighted a number of concerns. The service was previously rated inadequate overall and was placed in special measures. Although some improvements had been made since our last inspection, the overall rating remains “Inadequate” and the service in special measures for a further 6 months during which time we will return to check if further improvements been made and sustained.
The overall rating for this service is 'Inadequate' and the service is therefore in 'Special measures'.
Services in special measures will be kept under review and, if we have not taken immediate action to propose to cancel the provider's registration of the service, will be inspected again within six months.
The expectation is that providers found to have been providing inadequate care should have made significant improvements within this timeframe. If not enough improvement is made within this timeframe so that there is still a rating of inadequate for any key question or overall, we will take action in line with our enforcement procedures to begin the process of preventing the provider from operating this service. This will lead to cancelling their registration or to varying the terms of their registration within six months if they do not improve. This service will continue to be kept under review and, if needed, could be escalated to urgent enforcement action. Where necessary, another inspection will be conducted within a further six months, and if there is not enough improvement so there is still a rating of inadequate for any key question or overall, we will take action to prevent the provider from operating this service. This will lead to cancelling their registration or to varying the terms of their registration.
For adult social care services the maximum time for being in special measures will usually be no more than 12 months. If the service has demonstrated improvements when we inspect it and it is no longer rated as inadequate for any of the five key questions it will no longer be in special measures.
The service had a registered manager in place. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.
At this inspection we found the service had not made improvements in regards to staff recruitment and we were seriously concerned about the lack of essential checks not being carried out before staff commenced employment. We urgently imposed a condition on the provider’s registration in regards to safe recruitment practices. The service was also unable to evidence whether or not there were sufficient numbers of staff to meet people’s needs. The provider who is also the registered manager (hereafter referred to as ‘the provider’) had been struggling to manage the service as they had also been working with staff to cover care calls to people due to the lack of sufficient staff. During this inspection we found the service had not implemented nor used quality assurance systems to drive improvement of the issues highlighted at the last inspection.
The service had made improvements to ensure staff delivered support that was effective and caring and this was in a way which promoted people's independence and wellbeing, whilst people's safety was ensured.
Systems had been developed to gain people's views and the provider shared with us what this would look like once implemented. Staff were better supported as team meetings were now taking place, training was being delivered and the provider had commenced supervisions with staff including observations of their practice. A complaints procedure was in the process of being developed and we saw evidence of how this would work once implemented.
Staff understood their responsibilities and how to keep people safe. People's rights in relation making decisions were also protected because management and staff understood the legal framework of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA). The manager and staff ensured access to healthcare services were readily available to people and worked with a range of health professionals, such as social workers, community mental health nurses and GPs to implement care and support plans.
People and their relatives told us staff were respectful and compassionate towards people ensuring privacy and dignity was valued. People were supported in a person centred way by staff who understood their roles in relation to encouraging independence whilst mitigating potential risks.
The provider now needed to ensure that areas of shortfalls were promptly addressed and where improvements had commenced that these were imbedded in long term consistent good practice.