• Dentist
  • Dentist

The Cottage Dental & Implant Clinic Limited

8 High Street, Wootton Bassett, Swindon, Wiltshire, SN4 7AA (01793) 855335

Provided and run by:
The Cottage Dental & Implant Clinic Limited

All Inspections

20 April 2021

During an inspection looking at part of the service

We undertook a follow up focused inspection of The Cottage Dental & Implant Clinic Limited on Tuesday 20 April 2021. This inspection was carried out to review in detail the actions taken by the registered provider to improve the quality of care and to confirm that the practice was now meeting legal requirements. We also reviewed regulations 19 fit and proper persons employed and 18 staffing.

The inspection was led by a CQC inspector who was supported by a specialist dental adviser.

We undertook a comprehensive inspection of The Cottage Dental & Implant Clinic Limited on 26 November 2019 under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 as part of our regulatory functions. We found the registered provider was not providing safe or well led care and was in breach of regulations; 12 Safe care and treatment and 17 Good governance of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014. You can read our report of that inspection by selecting the 'all reports' link for The Cottage Dental & Implant Clinic Limited on our website www.cqc.org.uk.

As part of this inspection we asked:

• Is it safe?

• Is it well-led?

When one or more of the five questions are not met we require the service to make improvements and send us an action plan. We then inspect again after a reasonable interval, focusing on the areas where improvement was required.

Our findings were:

Are services safe?

We found this practice was providing safe care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

The provider had made improvements in relation to the regulatory breach we found at our inspection on 26 November 2019.

Are services well-led?

We found this practice was providing well-led care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

The provider had made improvements in relation to the regulatory breach we found at our inspection on 26 November 2019.

Background

The Cottage Dental & Implant Clinic Limited is in Wootton Bassett, near Swindon and provides mainly private treatment for adults and children with a small NHS contract.

A temporary ramp can be used for patients requiring assistance into the practice as there is not level access for people who use wheelchairs and those with pushchairs. Car parking spaces, including dedicated parking for patients with disabilities, are available near the practice.

The dental team includes one dentist, one trainee dental nurse, a consultant manager (for governance implementation only) and two receptionists. The practice has two treatment rooms.

The practice is owned by a company and as a condition of registration must have a person registered with the Care Quality Commission as the registered manager. Registered managers have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated regulations about how the practice is run. The registered manager at The Cottage Dental & Implant Clinic Limited is the principal dentist.

During the inspection we spoke with the dentist, the trainee dental nurse, the consultant manager and the receptionist. We looked at practice policies and procedures and other records about how the service is managed.

The practice is open:

  • Monday to Thursday 8:30am-5:30pm
  • Friday 8:30am-1:30pm

Our key findings were:

  • The systems in place to manage medical emergencies had improved. Monitoring of the equipment was carried out at appropriate intervals. All equipment and medicines were held at the practice in accordance with guidelines.
  • Medicines were monitored to ensure they were safe to use and within their useby date.
  • Infection control equipment was now maintained at appropriate intervals, in accordance with guidelines and manufacturers instructions.
  • Actions had been addressed following a legionella risk assessment and regular monitoring was in place to reduce the risks associated with legionella.
  • There was a process in place to monitor and report on incidents.
  • The provider informed us conscious sedation had not been carried out since our last inspection and would be started again when there was sufficiently trained staff.
  • Infection control audits had not been completed on a six monthly basis but there was a plan in place to ensure this was consistently completed in the future.
  • A safer sharps risk assessment had been completed in accordance with what procedures were in place at the practice.
  • The provider had ensured portable appliance testing and an electrical installation safety check had been carried out.
  • Patient feedback was sourced and analysed to ensure the provider could constantly improve its service.
  • There was an induction process in place and this was followed when staff were recruited.
  • There was a system in place to ensure staff were recruited safely. The provider needed to ensure if there was missing information when staff were recruited then a risk assessment was carried out.
  • There was a system in place to ensure staff were suitably trained and supported to carry out their role effectively.

There were areas where the provider could make improvements. They should:

  • Implement an effective recruitment procedure to ensure that appropriate checks are completed prior to new staff commencing employment at the practice.
  • Take action to ensure that all clinical staff have a risk assessment in place until there is evidence of adequate immunity for vaccine preventable infectious diseases.
  • Implement an effective system of checks of medical emergency equipment and medicines taking into account the guidelines issued by the Resuscitation Council (UK) and the General Dental Council.

26 November 2019

During a routine inspection

We carried out this unannounced inspection on 26 November 2018 under section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 as part of our regulatory functions. We planned the inspection to check whether the registered provider was meeting the legal requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated regulations. The inspection was led by a Care Quality Commission, (CQC), inspector who was supported by a specialist dental adviser.

To get to the heart of patients’ experiences of care and treatment, we always ask the following five questions:

• Is it safe?

• Is it effective?

• Is it caring?

• Is it responsive to people’s needs?

• Is it well-led?

These questions form the framework for the areas we look at during the inspection.

Our findings were:

Are services safe?

We found this practice was not providing safe care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services effective?

We found this practice was providing effective care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services caring?

We found this practice was providing caring services in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services responsive?

We found this practice was providing responsive care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services well-led?

We found this practice was not providing well-led care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Background

The Cottage Dental and Implant Clinic is in Swindon and provides NHS and private dental care and treatment for adults and children.

There is not level access to the practice for people who use wheelchairs and those with pushchairs. Car parking spaces, including dedicated parking for people with disabilities, are available near the practice.

The dental team includes a dentist, at the time of our inspection the practice was using agency dental nurses, a dental hygienist, a practice manager and one receptionist. The practice has two treatment rooms.

The practice is owned by an individual who is the principal dentist. They have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated regulations about how the practice is run.

During the inspection we spoke with the dentist, a dental nurse the receptionist and the practice manager. We looked at practice policies and procedures and other records about how the service is managed.

The practice is open:

Monday to Thursday 8.30am to 5.30pm

Friday 8.30am to 1.30pm

Saturday and Sunday – closed

Our key findings were:

  • The practice appeared to be visibly clean and well-maintained.
  • The provider had safeguarding processes and staff knew their responsibilities for safeguarding vulnerable adults and children.
  • The provider had staff recruitment procedures which reflected current legislation.
  • Staff treated patients with dignity and respect and took care to protect their privacy and personal information.
  • Staff provided preventive care and supported patients to ensure better oral health.
  • The appointment system took account of patients’ needs.
  • The provider asked staff and patients for feedback about the services they provided.
  • The provider dealt with complaints positively and efficiently.
  • The provider had information governance arrangements.
  • The provider had infection control procedures which did not reflect published guidance.
  • Staff knew how to deal with emergencies. Appropriate medicines and some life-saving equipment were available.
  • Staff did not feel involved and supported and the team was fragmented.

We identified regulations the provider was not complying with. They must:

  • Ensure care and treatment is provided in a safe way to patients

  • Establish effective systems and processes to ensure good governance in accordance with the fundamental standards of care

Full details of the regulation/s the provider was/is not meeting are at the end of this report.

There were areas where the provider could make improvements. They should:

  • Review the necessity of a second oxygen cylinder where appropriate for the practice's circumstances.
  • Implement audits for prescribing of antibiotic medicines taking into account the guidance provided by the Faculty of General Dental Practice.

28 November 2013

During a routine inspection

People told us they were satisfied with the treatment they received. We were told that all the staff were polite, professional and treated people with respect.

People told us they received appropriate information about their treatment and aftercare and that information about costs was clearly communicated.

Clear information was provided to patients if they wished to make a complaint or raise a concern.

The practice had policies and procedures in place to promote and manage infection control and maintain a hygienic environment. Staff had completed training in infection control and the procedures to follow with regards to cleaning and sterilising equipment.

There were systems and checks in place to monitor and manage risks. The practice nurse audited various aspects of the practice including staff training, patient files and health and safety risk assessments. We found that equipment was regularly maintained and serviced.

The practice had conducted a survey of a selection of patients.