• Care Home
  • Care home

Archived: Woodlands Care Home

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

84 Long Lane, Uxbridge, Middlesex, UB10 8SX (01895) 634830

Provided and run by:
Mrs Sybil Agatha Rose & Ms Marcia Loren Patterson-James

Important: The provider of this service changed. See new profile

All Inspections

15, 16 and 31 July 2014

During a routine inspection

We carried out this inspection under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 as part of our regulatory functions. This inspection was planned to check whether the provider is meeting the legal requirements and regulations associated with the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and to pilot a new inspection process being introduced by the Care Quality Commission (CQC) which looks at the overall quality of the service.

This was an unannounced inspection. The last inspection took place on 20 March 2014 and the provider was compliant with the regulations we checked.

Woodlands Care Home provides personal care for up to 17 people with dementia care needs in single bedrooms. At the time of the inspection the home had no vacancies.

The registered manager has worked at the service for several years.  A registered manager is a person who has registered with the CQC to manage the service and has the legal responsibility for meeting the requirements of the law, as does the provider.

People and their relatives were happy with the care provided and told us they felt safe and staff treated them with dignity and respect. We found the service to be meeting the requirements of the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS) and Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA).

We identified some shortfalls with medicines management, which could place people at risk of not receiving their medicines safely. This was a breach of the regulation in relation to medicines management. You can see what action we told the provider to take at the back of the full version of the report.

Staff understood safeguarding and whistleblowing procedures and were clear about the process to follow to report concerns. Staff we spoke with and records we saw confirmed recruitment and training procedures were being followed. Staff demonstrated an understanding of people’s individual needs and wishes and knew how to meet them.

People using the service, relatives and staff said the manager was approachable and supportive. Systems were in place to monitor the quality of the service and people and relatives felt confident to express any concerns, so these could be addressed.

20 March 2014

During an inspection looking at part of the service

We did not speak to people using the service as part of this inspection. The purpose of this inspection was to follow up on areas where we had asked the provider to make improvements. These related to the service having suitable recruitment procedures and an effective system to monitor the quality of service provision.

We found the provider had taken action following our last visit to improve recruitment procedures and quality assurance monitoring within the service.

17 August 2013

During a routine inspection

We spoke with the manager, deputy manager, three care staff, four people who were using the service and four relatives who were visiting the home at the time of our inspection. Many of the people using the service had complex needs which meant they were unable to share their experiences with us. However, we observed care in the home, spoke with staff and relatives and looked at care records in order to understand their experiences.

The relatives we spoke with told us they were kept informed about their family member's welfare. One relative said, 'they let us know if there have been any changes and involve us.' Relatives also told us they sometimes attended relatives meetings and were invited to social events such as a Christmas party and a summer barbeque.

We observed lunch being served and saw that staff assisted people in a sensitive manner, taking their time and explaining what was being served and what would happen next. We saw that people's requests for support were responded to promptly. We found that people's needs were assessed and care plans developed that considered any risks to people's welfare and these were updated at regular intervals or as people's needs changed.

We found that people were protected from abuse. Staff had received safeguarding training and were aware of their responsibilities in relation to reporting concerns and keeping people safe. People told us they felt safe in the home.

We found that there were gaps in the staff recruitment procedures for the home that meant the provider could not be assured that staff working at the home were suitable to work with vulnerable adults.

The provider did not have adequate systems in place for monitoring the quality of the service.

12 January 2013

During a routine inspection

We used a number of different methods to help us understand the experiences of people using the service, because most of them had complex needs which meant they were not able to tell us their experiences. We spoke with the manager, deputy manager and one other member of staff. We also spoke with a visiting professional, two people who were visiting people and two people who lived at the home. We looked at people's care records and observed the care being given.

We saw that pre-admission assessments had been completed prior to people moving into the home and people, their relatives, representatives and relevant healthcare professionals had been involved in this process. Care plans had been developed and risk assessments completed and these were reviewed on a regular basis. People told us they were well cared for and one relative said, "I have never had a moments worry about (their) care". People were supported to take part in activities such as bingo and singing and dancing.

The home was clean, warm and generally well maintained. Health and safety checks were being completed including regular checks in relation to fire safety.

Staff told us there was always enough staff on duty and there were a range of staff in different roles to support the smooth running of the home.

There was an effective system in place for making complaints and a visitor told us that staff listened to any issues that were raised.

15 November 2011

During a routine inspection

People said they were happy living at the home, with one saying 'I couldn't fault the place.' Visitors said that family members had been able to visit the home to see if it was suitable for their relative. One visitor said their relative 'couldn't be in a better place' and other positive comments were received from visitors and people living at the home.

People told us were being well looked after at the home and enjoyed the activities including going out into the garden in the good weather. Visitors said they were happy with the care their relative was receiving, and that they were made welcome whenever they visited and could join in the activities with their relative.

People said that they were able to speak to staff if they had any concerns and were confident they would be listened to.

People told us that staff were 'good' and looked after them well. Visitors said they were 'very good staff' and another said that staff were 'very good with people who could be challenging.' All the people and visitors we spoke with were positive in their comments about the staff.