Archived: this is my: London Screening Centre

Updated 13 December 2019

this is my: London Screening Centre is operated by this is my: limited. The service opened in 2013 and relocated to this location in 2016 following patient feedback. It is a private clinic based in rented accommodation in a building operated by another medical provider. The service accepts self-referring patients from any area.

The service has had a registered manager in post since December 2015.

We did not inspect the other services in the building, which were provided by another organisation.

Updated 13 December 2019

this is my: London Screening Centre is operated by this is my: limited. The service operates at this location on Saturdays and rents one clinical room for this purpose. The service is part of a national network of multiple locations with individual CQC registrations led by a single registered manager, who is the managing director. Facilities include one ultrasound room and a waiting room shared with other providers in the same building. We did not inspect these services during this inspection.

The service provides obstetric and non-obstetric ultrasound, including non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT).

The service offers screening to patients on a private, self-pay basis.

We inspected this service using our comprehensive inspection methodology. We carried out an unannounced visit to the service on 2 March 2019.

To get to the heart of patients’ experiences of care and treatment, we ask the same five questions of all services: are they safe, effective, caring, responsive to people's needs, and well-led? Where we have a legal duty to do so we rate services’ performance against each key question as outstanding, good, requires improvement or inadequate.

Throughout the inspection, we took account of what people told us and how the provider understood and complied with the Mental Capacity Act 2005.

We rated the service as Good overall.

We found good practice in relation to diagnostic imaging care:

• The service had enough staff to care for patients and keep them safe. Staff had training in key skills, understood how to protect patients from abuse, and managed safety well. The service controlled infection risk well. Staff assessed risks to patients, acted on them and kept good care records. They managed medicines well. The service managed safety incidents well and learned lessons from them. Staff collected safety information and used it to improve the service.
• Staff provided good care and treatment, gave patients enough to eat and drink, and gave them pain relief when they needed it. Managers monitored the effectiveness of the service and made sure staff were competent. Staff worked well together for the benefit of patients, advised them on how to lead healthier lives, and supported them to make decisions about their care. Staff had good access to information. Key services were available seven days a week.
• Staff treated patients with compassion and kindness, respected their privacy and dignity, took account of their individual needs, and helped them understand their conditions. They provided emotional support to patients, families and carers.
• The service planned care to meet the needs of local people, took account of patients’ individual needs, and made it easy for people to give feedback. People could access the service when they needed it and did not have to wait too long for treatment.
• Leaders ran services well using reliable information systems and supported staff to develop their skills. Staff understood the service’s vision and values, and how to apply them in their work. Staff felt respected, supported and valued. They were focused on the needs of patients receiving care. Staff were clear about their roles and accountabilities. The service engaged well with patients and the community to plan and manage services and all staff were committed to improving services continually.

Following this inspection, we told the provider that it should make other improvements, even though a regulation had not been breached, to help the service improve. Details are at the end of the report.

Dr Nigel Acheson

Chief Inspector of Hospitals

Updated 13 December 2019

We rated the service as good overall because it was safe, effective, caring, responsive and well led.