• Dentist
  • Dentist

Archived: Whitby Dental Care

9 Victoria Square, Whitby, North Yorkshire, YO21 1EA 07525 787381

Provided and run by:
Ishak Practices Ltd

All Inspections

29 April 2021

During an inspection looking at part of the service

We undertook a follow up focused inspection of Whitby Dental Care on 29 April 2021. This inspection was carried out to review in detail the actions taken by the registered provider to improve the quality of care and to confirm that the practice was now meeting legal requirements.

The inspection was led by a CQC inspector who was supported by a specialist dental adviser and the CQC senior national professional dental advisor.

We undertook a comprehensive inspection of Whitby Dental Care on 16 March 2021 under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 as part of our regulatory functions. We found the registered provider was not providing safe and well led care and was in breach of Regulation 12(1) of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014. You can read our report of that inspection by selecting the 'all reports' link for Whitby Dental Care on our website www.cqc.org.uk.

As part of this inspection we asked:

• Is it safe?

• Is it well-led?

Our findings were:

Are services safe?

The provider had made improvements in relation to the conditions imposed to suspend regulated activities at the location on 19 March 2021.

Are services well-led?

The provider had made improvements in relation to the conditions imposed to suspend regulated activities at the location on 19 March 2021.

Background

Whitby Dental Care is in Whitby, North Yorkshire and provides NHS and private dental care for adults and children.

There is level access to the practice for people who use wheelchairs and those with pushchairs. Car parking spaces are available near the practice at local car parks for a fee.

At the time of inspection, the dental team included two dentists (one of whom was not present during the inspection), one chairside support staff member, who was waiting to commence dental nurse training, and a receptionist. The team was supported on the inspection day by a practice manager and a lead dental nurse from a sister practice. The provider and registered manager were also present during the inspection.

The practice has four treatment rooms.

The practice is owned by a company and as a condition of registration must have a person registered with the CQC as the registered manager. Registered managers have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated regulations about how the practice is run. The registered manager at Whitby Dental Care is one of the company partners.

During the inspection we spoke with all staff present at the time of inspection. We reviewed systems, processes and procedures to assess where improvements to how the service is managed had been made.

The practice is open: Monday to Friday 9am – 5pm.

Our key findings were:

  • The provider had taken into account guidance issued by Public Health England (PHE) in respect to Covid-19.
  • The practice’s Infection prevention and control systems and procedures were completed in line with The Health Technical Memorandum 01-05: Decontamination in primary care dental practices, (HTM 01-05), published by the Department of Health and Social Care.
  • The legionella management system was improved but required further attention to ensure it was fully effective and embedded.
  • The provider had reviewed recruitment, training and the monitoring of associated staff records; sharps risk and Hepatitis B risk mitigation required further attention to ensure they were fully effective and embedded.
  • Systems to review and investigate when things went wrong had improved but required further attention to ensure they were fully effective and embedded.
  • Staff felt involved and supported to work as a team. Staff were confident their concerns would be heard without fear of recrimination.
  • Information governance arrangements were not in place in respect to the use of CCTV.
  • Staff were not aware of the role and responsibility associated with being named as the Radiation Protection Supervisor.
  • Systems were in place to provide effective staffing.
  • The proposed systems to ensure effective leadership, governance and oversight of on-site management had improved and required monitoring and embedding.

We identified regulations the provider was not meeting. They must:

  • Establish effective systems and processes to ensure good governance in accordance with the fundamental standards of care.

Full details of the regulation the provider is not meeting are at the end of this report.

There were areas where the provider could make improvements. They should:

  • Review the practice's protocols and procedures for the use of X-ray equipment in compliance with The Ionising Radiations Regulations 2017 and Ionising Radiation (Medical Exposure) Regulations 2017 and taking into account the guidance for Dental Practitioners on the Safe Use of X-ray Equipment. In particular: Review the location of isolation switch and the clinician’s knowledge and awareness of the role of Radiation Protection Supervisor (RPS).

16 March 2021

During an inspection looking at part of the service

We carried out this unannounced focused inspection on 16 March 2021 under section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 as part of our regulatory functions. We responded to information of concern and planned the inspection to check whether the registered provider was meeting the legal requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated regulations. The inspection was led by a Care Quality Commission, (CQC), inspector who was supported by a specialist dental adviser.

To get to the heart of patients’ experiences of care and treatment, we asked the following key questions:

• Is it safe?

• Is it well-led?

These questions form the framework for the areas we look at during the inspection.

Our findings were:

Are services safe?

We found this practice was not providing safe care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services well-led?

We found this practice was not providing well-led care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Background

Whitby Dental Care is in Whitby, North Yorkshire and provides NHS and private dental care and treatment for adults and children.

There is level access to the practice for people who use wheelchairs and those with pushchairs. Car parking spaces are available near the practice at local car parks for a fee.

At the time of inspection, the dental team included three dentists (one of whom was under mentorship to attain appropriate validation to work within the NHS), three chairside support staff (none of whom had commenced a dental nurse training pathway) and a receptionist. The practice has four treatment rooms.

The practice is owned by a company and as a condition of registration must have a person registered with the CQC as the registered manager. Registered managers have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated regulations about how the practice is run. The registered manager at Whitby Dental Care is one of the company partners.

During the inspection we spoke with two dentists, two chairside support staff and the receptionist. The registered manager and provider were also present during the inspection day. We looked at practice policies and procedures and other records about how the service is managed.

The practice is open: Monday to Friday 9am – 5pm.

Our key findings were:

  • Staff knew how to deal with emergencies. Appropriate medicines and life-saving equipment were available.
  • The provider had not taken into account guidance issued by Public Health England (PHE) in respect to Covid-19.
  • The practice’s Infection prevention and control systems and procedures were not completed in line with The Health Technical Memorandum 01-05: Decontamination in primary care dental practices, (HTM 01-05), published by the Department of Health and Social Care.
  • Legionella management systems were not effectively monitored in line with Health Technical Memorandum 04-01: Safe water in healthcare premises (HTM 04-01) and the HSE HSG 274 Part 2 (2014).
  • The systems in place to help staff manage risk to patients and staff were not effectively implemented or monitored for compliance, including, safer sharps handling, safety of equipment and fire safety management.
  • Systems in place to maintain recruitment and training procedures and continued monitoring and oversight of associated records were not operating effectively.
  • Systems for reviewing and investigating when things went wrong were not in place.
  • The provider did not demonstrate a culture of continuous improvement.
  • Staff did not feel involved or supported to work as a team. Staff were not confident their concerns would be heard without fear of recrimination.
  • Information governance arrangements were not in place in respect to the use of CCTV.
  • Effective staffing was not in place.
  • We found effective leadership, governance and oversight of on-site management systems and processes were not in place.

We identified regulations the provider was not complying with. They must:

  • Ensure care and treatment is provided in a safe way to patients

15 August 2017

During a routine inspection

We carried out this announced inspection on 15 August 2017 under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 as part of our regulatory functions. We planned the inspection to check whether the registered provider was meeting the legal requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated regulations. The inspection was led by a CQC inspector who was supported by a specialist dental adviser.

We told the NHS England area team and Healthwatch that we were inspecting the practice. We did not receive any information of concern from them.

To get to the heart of patients’ experiences of care and treatment, we always ask the following five questions:

• Is it safe?

• Is it effective?

• Is it caring?

• Is it responsive to people’s needs?

• Is it well-led?

These questions form the framework for the areas we look at during the inspection.

Our findings were:

Are services safe?

We found that this practice was providing safe care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services effective?

We found that this practice was providing effective care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services caring?

We found that this practice was providing caring services in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services responsive?

We found that this practice was providing responsive care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services well-led?

We found that this practice was providing well-led care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Background

Whitby Dental Care provides NHS and private treatment to adults and children.

There is level access for people who use wheelchairs and pushchairs. Car parking spaces are available near the practice.

The dental team includes three dentists, five dental nurses, three of which are trainees and one is also the practice manager. The practice has four surgeries, two on each floor.

The practice is owned by a company and as a condition of registration must have a person registered with the Care Quality Commission as the registered manager. Registered managers have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated regulations about how the practice is run. The registered manager at Whitby Dental Care was one of the directors.

On the day of inspection we collected three CQC comment cards filled in by patients and spoke with eight other patients. This information gave us a positive view of the practice.

During the inspection we spoke with the registered manager, three dentists, two dental nurses and the practice manager. We looked at practice policies and procedures and other records about how the service is managed.

The practice is open:

Monday – Friday 9am – 5pm.

Our key findings were:

  • The practice was clean and well maintained.
  • The practice had infection control procedures which reflected published guidance.
  • Staff knew how to deal with emergencies. Appropriate medicines and life-saving equipment were available.
  • The practice had systems to help them manage risk.
  • The practice had suitable safeguarding processes and staff knew their responsibilities for safeguarding adults and children.
  • The practice had thorough staff recruitment procedures.
  • The clinical staff provided patients’ care and treatment in line with current guidelines.
  • Staff treated patients with dignity and respect and took care to protect their privacy and personal information.
  • The appointment system met patients’ needs.
  • The practice had effective leadership. Staff felt involved and supported and worked well as a team.
  • The practice asked staff and patients for feedback about the services they provided.
  • The practice dealt with complaints positively and efficiently.