We considered our inspection findings to answer questions we always ask; is the service caring? Is the service responsive? Is the service safe? Is the service effective? Is the service well led?Below is a summary of what we found. The summary is based on our observations during the inspection, speaking with people using the service, the staff supporting them and from looking at records. If you would like to see the evidence supporting our summary please read the full report.
Is the service safe?
People told us and our observations showed, there were enough staff on duty to meet people's needs. The home had detailed systems for assessing environmental risks and hazards.
Audits on cleanliness of the environment were performed. We saw the areas audited were clean and smelt fresh. Some areas were not included in the audit, for example cleanliness of wheeled equipment and procedures in relation to laundry. The areas which were not documented needed attention to ensure safe infection control practice.
The home had appropriate storage facilities and records relating to medicines. Medicines were not secured at all times. This was because medicines trolleys were not locked when in communal areas of the home. We found there were discrepancies in documentation relating to medicines, including controlled drugs.
CQC monitors the operation of the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards which applies to care homes. No applications have needed to be submitted from this home. Relevant staff we spoke with were aware of appropriate actions to follow in relation to these safeguards.
We have asked the provider to tell us what they are going to do to meet the requirements of the law in relation to safe management of medicines and infection control.
Is the service effective?
People we spoke with said the home met their needs. One person told us 'oh yes, this is a nice place.' We saw staff supporting people, including people living with dementia, in an appropriate way. A person told us about the help they received in the home. They had improved to the extent where they did not need to see the district nurse regularly. Another person had changes in their mobility. Their care plan had been revised and we saw the person using their walking aid in a safe way.
Is the service caring?
We observed staff were kindly and caring when they supported people. A person told us 'I've got a bell and if I need them, I just ring and they are there.' We saw a person requested to go to the toilet urgently during a meal. A member of staff promptly supported them. A person told a care worker how much their arthritic knees were hurting. The care worker helped the person to go to their room, explaining they would then apply some pain-relieving gel to their knees.
Is the service responsive?
We saw there were staff available to support people in pursuing recreational activities. In one sitting area, a care worker was engaged with two people holding a general discussion about holidays, in a relaxed and easy manner. We observed a person asking a care worker what their medicines were for. The care worker took time to explain this to the person. All 12 staff we spoke with reported they received help very quickly from other members of staff if they found a person who needed urgent assistance.
We saw there were a lack of written care plans for people who were admitted on a short term basis. This meant all staff would not be aware of how to respond to these people's needs. Where people were self-medicating or prescribed medicines on an 'as required' basis, there were no assessments or care plans to direct staff on how they were to respond to people's individual needs. There were a lack of protocols where people had requested staff to lock their rooms when they were not in them. This meant the home could not demonstrate all relevant persons had been consulted and risks for people responded to.
We have asked the provider to tell us what they are going to do to meet the requirements of the law in relation to people admitted on a short term basis, assessments and care plans relating to medicines and development of protocols in relation to locking of people's bedroom doors.
Is the service well led?
The home had not had a registered manager for an extended period of time. A new manager had been appointed. This person was in the process of applying to the CQC to be the registered manager. The provider had quality audit processes in place, for example in relation to maintenance of the building and health and safety matters. The new manager had set up systems for consultation with people, relatives and staff. Staff told us they knew how to raise issues with management and reported they were listened to if they did this.