We carried out a review of the data available to us about Comfort Call - Cheltenham on 6 July 2023. We have not found evidence that we need to carry out an inspection or reassess our rating at this stage.
This could change at any time if we receive new information. We will continue to monitor data about this service.
If you have concerns about Comfort Call - Cheltenham, you can give feedback on this service.
Not everyone using Comfort Call - Cheltenham receives the regulated activity; CQC only inspects the service being received by people provided with ‘personal care’; help with tasks related to personal hygiene and eating. Where they do we also take into account any wider social care provided.
Comfort Call – Cheltenham had a registered manager in post. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.
Comfort Call – Cheltenham had significantly increased the number of people receiving personal care and the numbers of staff employed in the past six months in response to local commissioning arrangements. The provider told us changes to the way the service operated had to be made at short notice. We found the service had effectively managed the transition of people's care arrangements as well as the transfer of staff during this period of change.
The registered manager had plans in place to improve the timeliness of some people’s calls and was aware that improvements were needed to how information was sent to people about times of visits and the staff allocated to them. However further improvement was needed to ensure people were always told when staff would be arriving late for a visit.
We made a recommendation about how information about visits was communicated to people.
People were protected from harm and abuse through the knowledge of staff and management. Risks to people's safety were identified, assessed and appropriate action was taken to keep people safe.
People were treated with respect and kindness. Their privacy and dignity was upheld and they were supported to maintain their independence.
People were supported by staff who had training and support to maintain their skills and knowledge to meet their needs. People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff support the in the least restrictive way possible; the policies and systems in the service support this practice.
People received personalised care from staff who knew their needs and preferences. People were involved in the planning and review of their care and support. There were arrangements in place to respond to concerns or complaints from people using the service and their representatives. Care was provided for people at the end of their life.
Quality assurance systems were in operation with the aim of improving the service in response to people's needs. A survey had been completed to gain the views of people about the service provided.
Further information is in the detailed findings below.