• Services in your home
  • Homecare service

Creative Support - Manchester Mental Health Personalisation Service

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

1 Brandon Avenue, Wythenshawe, Manchester, M22 4BF (0161) 225 1794

Provided and run by:
Creative Support Limited

Important: This service was previously registered at a different address - see old profile

Latest inspection summary

On this page

Background to this inspection

Updated 18 July 2018

We carried out this inspection under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 as part of our regulatory functions. This inspection was planned to check whether the provider is meeting the legal requirements and regulations associated with the Health and Social Care Act 2008, to look at the overall quality of the service, and to provide a rating for the service under the Care Act 2014.

The inspection took place on 23 May 2018 and was announced. The provider was given 24 hours’ notice because the location provides personal care and support to adults in different supported living settings. We needed to be sure somebody would be available at the registered office to talk with us. This was the first inspection since the service was registered. One inspector carried out the inspection.

Before the inspection, the provider completed a Provider Information Return PIR). This is a form that asks the provider to give some key information about the service, what the service does well and improvements they plan to make. We looked at the evidence we already held about the service including notifications the provider had sent to us. A notification is information about important events which the service is required to send us by law. We also contacted the local authority to obtain their views. The local authority had no information regarding the service.

During the inspection we visited both properties in which one property is the registered office. We spoke with the registered manager, the unit business manager, three staff members and four people who used the service. We reviewed two peoples care files including care plans and risk assessments. We reviewed four staff recruitment files, training and supervision records. We looked at records relating to how the service was managed including medicines, quality assurance and policies and procedures.

Overall inspection

Good

Updated 18 July 2018

The inspection took place on 23 May 2018 and was announced. We gave Creative Support – Manchester Mental Health, 24 hours’ notice to advise we would visit as we needed to ensure someone would be available at the registered office. This was the first inspection since the service had been registered. The service had operated for a number of years before becoming registered with the Care Quality Commission under the registration of “personal care”.

Creative Support – Manchester Mental Health provides care and support to people in ‘supported living’ settings to enable people to live as independently as possible. People’s care and housing are provided under separate contractual agreements. The Care Quality Commission (CQC) does not regulate premises used for supported living; this inspection looked as people’s personal care and support.

Creative Support – Manchester Mental Health supports people with enduring mental health needs. At the time of inspection, there were 10 people receiving personal care living across two services situated in the south of Manchester. Each service supports up to five people at any one time.

There was a registered manager in post however they were not available on the day of inspection as they were on leave. We did speak to the registered manager following the inspection. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements on the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated regulations about how the service is run.

People were safe while being supported by the service. Appropriate risk assessments were in place to support people and were regularly evaluated to keep people safe.

Staff were aware of procedures in place in relation to keeping vulnerable people safe, they could describe signs of abuse and were aware of the processes in place for reporting any allegations.

Recruitment procedures were robust and staff members were recruited safely.

Medicines were safely managed and audited.

Health and safety of the property. was monitored by the service including fire safety and premises safety.

The service continually assessed the property to ensure if was fit for purpose in meeting the needs of the people living there.

There were sufficient numbers of staff members on duty to support the assessed needs of people.

Staff members received regular training and support to enable them to carry out their role effectively.

Staff members were given regular supervision and appraisal.

People received a thorough, comprehensive assessment prior to being supported by the service.

People were supported to remain as independent as possible and were assessed to be able to go out alone and administer medication.

The principles of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 were followed and meetings were held in people’s best interests when people did not have capacity or were unable to consent.

There were kind and caring interactions between staff members and people being supported by the service. People told us that they felt well cared for by the staff team.

We observed that staff were respectful to people when talking to them and communicated in a manner in which people could understand.

People were involved in decisions at the service including meal planning, relocation of rooms, activities and budgeting.

Care plans were robust, detailed and person centred. People were involved in their care plans and set goals and aspirations.

Activities were person centred and were encouraged.

Concerns and complaints were responded to in a timely manner and outcomes agreed and shared.

The registered manager and unit business manager had complete oversight of the service, they knew people and the staff team well and everyone we spoke with was very complimentary of them both.

People and the staff team told us that they had full confidence in the registered manager that they would act on any concerns or requests and that they responded promptly.

There were a number of audits in place to monitor and improve the service.

The service sought feedback from people and stakeholders to enable them to monitor improve.