12 August 2019
During a routine inspection
People’s experience of using this service and what we found:
Some of the risks relating to people needs and the environment had not been effectively managed. Medicines were not being managed safely or in line with best practice frameworks. There were not always sufficient numbers of staff deployed to meet people’s needs. The home was clean. There were systems in place to learn from when things go wrong.
The systems in place had not been fully effective at improving the quality and safety of the service. Overall staff told us they had confidence in the way the service was managed, and they were clear about their role and responsibilities. There were some systems in place to actively seek the engagement and involvement of people and staff in developing the service and driving improvements. The leadership team were transparent and collaborative and demonstrated a commitment to improve the service. The manager took on board the feedback from our inspection and took immediate action to resolve the shortfalls identified.
Staff, including agency staff, demonstrated a good understanding of the individual personalities of the people they supported and were able to talk about people’s preferred routines. The support provided did not always empower people to have as much control and independence as possible. The service had taken steps to provide information to people in ways which they understood. Systems were in place to investigate and respond to complaints or concerns. End of life care plans were to be developed as part of the planned person-centred reviews of people’s care and support.
Staff and management had worked collaboratively with a number of mental health professionals to better understand and improve the support being provided to effectively meet people’s needs. There was evidence that capacity to consent to care and support was considered as part of the care planning process. However, this had not always been well documented. People continued to be supported to have enough to eat and drink and their dietary needs were met. The premises were suitable for people’s needs, but many of the fixtures or fittings were tired or worn and would benefit from being updated or replaced. A suitable training programme was in place.
Overall, people were supported by staff who were kind and caring and whom understood how to protect their dignity. However, some of the interactions we saw were neutral and could have been more person centred.
Rating at last inspection
The last rating for this service was ‘Good’ (published 17 March 2017).
Why we inspected
Follow up
We will return to visit as per our re-inspection programme. If we receive any concerning information we may inspect sooner.
For more details, please see the full report which is on the CQC website at www.cqc.org.uk