• Doctor
  • Independent doctor

Tooting Medical Centre

5 London Road, London, SW17 9JR (020) 8767 8389

Provided and run by:
Tooting Med Centre Ltd

All Inspections

26 July 2018

During an inspection looking at part of the service

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at Tooting Medical Centre on 27 and 28 March 2018. We found that this service was not providing well-led care in accordance with the relevant regulations. The full comprehensive report for the comprehensive inspection can be found by selecting the ‘all reports’ link for Tooting Medical Centre on our website at www.cqc.org.uk.

This inspection was an announced focused inspection carried out on 26 July 2018 to confirm that the practice had carried out their plan to meet the legal requirements in relation to the breach in regulation that we identified in our previous inspection on 27 and 28 March 2018. We carried out this inspection under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 as part of our regulatory functions. This report covers our findings in relation to those requirements and also additional improvements made since our last inspection.

Tooting Med Centre Ltd provides private medical, dental and aesthetic services at Tooting Medical Centre in the London Borough of Merton. Services are provided to both adults and children.

This service is registered with CQC under the Health and Social Care Act 2008 in respect of the provision of advice or treatment by a medical or dental practitioner, including the prescribing of medicines. At Tooting Med Centre Ltd the aesthetic treatments that are provided by therapists are exempt from CQC regulation.

Our findings were:

Are services well-led?

We found that this service was providing well-led care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Our key findings were:

  • There was evidence that incidents and safety alerts were shared with all staff effectively.
  • The service had introduced a clear system to ensure training for staff was monitored.
  • Mental Capacity Act training had been undertaken by clinical staff and managers of the service.
  • There were systems for monitoring and checking that medical equipment was adequately maintained.
  • Chaperoning services were clearly advertised to patients in the reception area and in consulting rooms in both Polish and English.
  • The service had reviewed and strengthened systems for recording routine vaccinations for clinical staff.
  • The service had implemented policies and procedures for verifying a patient’s identity at each consultation, although checks could not always be recorded on the electronic system used by reception staff.
  • There was a policy outlining considerations for sharing information with patients’ GPs.
  • There was evidence of some quality improvement measures that had been initiated since the last inspection to monitor whether medical assessments and treatments are carried out in line with evidence based guidance and standards.
  • The service had implemented written dental patient assessment templates to ensure dental care records considered relevant nationally recognised evidence-based guidance.

There were areas where the provider could make improvements and should:

  • Monitor the updated dental care record systems to ensure they are in line with guidance and standards.
  • Continue to develop quality improvement systems that monitor whether medical assessments and treatments are carried out in line with relevant and current evidence based guidance and standards.

Background to this inspection

Tooting Med Centre Ltd is an independent provider of medical, dental and aesthetic services and treats both adults and children. The address of the registered provider is 5 London Road, London, SW17 9JR. Tooting Med Centre Ltd is registered with the Care Quality Commission to provide the regulated activity diagnostic and screening procedures, surgical procedures, termination of pregnancies and treatment of disease, disorder or injury. Regulated activities are provided at two clinic locations in South London; we inspected the location Tooting Medical Centre.

The organisation is run by the nominated individual for the provider. There are two registered managers, who are the general managers of the service. A registered manager is a person who is registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have a legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

The clinic is housed over three floors in leased premises in Tooting. The premises consist of a patient waiting room and reception area, three dental surgeries and a phlebotomy/consultation room on the ground floor, a decontamination room and two treatment rooms in the basement, a staff room, office and three medical consultation rooms which are located over the first and second floors.

The clinic is open between 9am and 9pm seven days a week. Services are available to people on a pre-bookable appointment basis and their clientele is primarily patients of Polish origin.

Regulated services offered at the clinic include general medical, gynaecological and emergency dental services. The service also provides termination of pregnancies and psychiatric services which were not inspected or reported on at this inspection.

At Tooting Med Centre Ltd the aesthetic treatments that are provided by therapists are exempt from CQC regulation and as such were not inspected or reported on.

Practice staff providing dental services consists of nine dentists, one dental nurse and three trainee dental nurses. Medical services are provided by 25 part time doctors, 17 of which are specialists across a range of medical fields including obstetrics and gynaecology, general medicine, cardiology and general psychiatry. Nine doctors reside in Poland and regularly travel to England to provide services for the provider. The medical team also consists of a nurse and a phlebotomist. Other employed health care staff, that are exempt from CQC registration, include a psychologist, colonic therapist, speech therapist and body analysis specialist. Administrative support for the medical and dental teams is provided by five reception staff members and two service managers.

Why we inspected the service:

The service has received 11 previous inspections since 2013 in response to concerns and to follow up on previous breaches of regulations. Since the inspection in November 2016, some areas of concern were identified from queries raised with us.

We undertook a comprehensive inspection of Tooting Medical Centre on 27 and 28 March 2018 under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 as part of our regulatory functions. We found that this service was not providing well-led care in accordance with the relevant regulations. The full comprehensive report for the comprehensive inspection can be found by selecting the ‘all reports’ link for Tooting Medical Centre on our website at www.cqc.org.uk.

We undertook this follow up focused inspection of Tooting Medical Centre on 26 July 2018. This inspection was carried out to review in detail the actions taken by the service to improve the quality of care and to confirm that the service was now meeting legal requirements.

How we inspected the service:

Our inspection team on 26 July 2018 was led by a CQC Lead Inspector.

Before visiting, we reviewed a range of information we hold about the service.

As part of the inspection we:

  • Spoke with the phlebotomist.
  • Spoke with the two registered managers of the service.
  • Spoke with the nurse ahead of the inspection.
  • Spoke with a doctor on the telephone after the inspection.
  • Looked at the systems in place for the running of the service.
  • Viewed changes in key policies and procedures.

On this focussed inspection we asked the following question about the service:

  • Is it well-led?

This question therefore formed the framework for the areas we looked at during the inspection.

27 and 28 March 2018

During a routine inspection

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection on 27 and 28 March 2018 to ask the service the following key questions: Are services safe, effective, caring, responsive and well-led?

Our findings were:

Are services safe?

We found that this service was providing safe care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services effective?

We found that this service was providing effective care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services caring?

We found that this service was providing caring services in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services responsive?

We found that this service was providing responsive care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services well-led?

We found that this service was not providing well-led care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

We carried out this inspection under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 as part of our regulatory functions. This inspection was planned to check whether the service was meeting the legal requirements and regulations associated with the Health and Social Care Act 2008. We also planned the inspection to check on concerns raised which we had received.

Tooting Med Centre Ltd provides private medical, dental and aesthetic services at Tooting Medical Centre in the London Borough of Merton. Services are provided to both adults and children.

This service is registered with CQC under the Health and Social Care Act 2008 in respect of the provision of advice or treatment by a medical or dental practitioner, including the prescribing of medicines. At Tooting Med Centre Ltd the aesthetic treatments that are provided by therapists are exempt from CQC regulation.

We received feedback from 26 people about the service, including comment cards, all of which were very positive about the service and indicated that patients were treated with kindness and respect. Staff were described as helpful, caring, thorough and professional.

Our key findings were:

  • The practice was clean and well maintained.
  • There were safe systems for the management of medicines and infection control.
  • Staff knew how to deal with emergencies. Appropriate medicines and life-saving equipment were available.
  • The practice had systems to help them manage risk although medical equipment was not always monitored effectively.
  • There was a system for recording and acting on adverse events, incidents and safety alerts although it was not clear that these were shared with medical staff effectively.
  • The practice had suitable safeguarding processes and staff knew their responsibilities for safeguarding adults and children.
  • The practice had completed thorough staff recruitment checks in most cases.
  • There was evidence of some quality improvement.
  • The practice had an effective clinical supervision system for medical staff.
  • Systems for monitoring safety training for medical staff were not always effective.
  • Staff treated patients with dignity and respect and took care to protect their privacy and personal information.
  • The appointment system met patients’ needs.
  • The practice had effective leadership. Staff felt involved and supported and worked well as a team.
  • The provider was aware of and had systems to ensure compliance with the requirements of the duty of candour.
  • The practice asked staff and patients for feedback about the services they provided.
  • The practice dealt with complaints positively and efficiently.

We identified regulations that were not being met and the provider must:

  • Establish effective systems and processes to ensure good governance in accordance with the fundamental standards of care.

You can see full details of the regulations not being met at the end of this report.

There were areas where the provider could make improvements and should:

  • Review the systems for monitoring and checking medical equipment.
  • Review how chaperoning services are advertised to patients.
  • Review the systems for recording vaccinations for clinical staff.
  • Review the system for documenting identification checks that have been carried out.
  • Review the processes for gaining consent to share information with patients’ GPs.
  • Review the provision of Mental Capacity Act training for clinical staff.
  • Review the practice's protocols for completion of dental care records taking into account the guidance provided by the Faculty of General Dental Practice.
  • Review the practice's protocols for dental patient assessments and ensure they are in compliance with current legislation and take into account relevant nationally recognised evidence-based guidance.
  • Review the systems that ensure medical assessments and treatments are carried out in line with relevant and current evidence based guidance and standards.

7 November 2016

During an inspection looking at part of the service

We carried out an unannounced follow up inspection at Tooting Medical Centre on 07 November 2016.

We had undertaken an announced comprehensive inspection of this service on 14 December 2015 as part of our regulatory functions where a breach of legal requirements was found. This report only covers our findings in relation to those requirements and we reviewed the practice against one of the five questions we ask about services: is the service safe and well-led?

Following a previous inspection on 14 December 2015 where we found shortfalls in the governance arrangements for the practice. On 07 November, we inspected the practice to ask the following key question; are services well-led?

We revisited Tooting Medical Centre as part of this review and checked whether they had followed their action plan and to confirm that they now met the legal requirements.

We found that this practice was now providing well-led care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

However, there were areas where the provider could make improvements and should:

  • Provide an annual statement in relation to infection prevention control required under The Health and Social Care Act 2008: ‘Code of Practice about the prevention and control of infections and related guidance
  • Review the appraisal process for staff so that a more formal system is introduced so that the training, learning and development needs of individual staff members are effectively assessed.
  • Review the practice’s audit protocols of various aspects of the service, such as infection control and dental care records at regular intervals to help improve the quality of service. Practice should also check that where appropriate audits have documented learning points and the resulting improvements can be demonstrated.

14 December 2016

During a routine inspection

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection on 14 December 2015 to ask the practice the following key questions. Are services safe, effective, caring, responsive and well-led?

Our findings were:

Are services safe?

We found that this service was providing safe care in accordance with relevant regulations.

Are services effective?

We found that this service was providing effective care in accordance with relevant regulations.

Are services caring?

We found that this service was providing caring services in accordance with relevant regulations.

Are services responsive?

We found that this service was providing responsive care in accordance with relevant regulations.

Are services well-led?

We found that this service was not providing well-led care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Background

Tooting Medical Centre is located in the London Borough of Merton. It provides various health services including dentistry to private fee paying patients to a mainly Polish population.

We previously inspected the practice on 11 March 2014 and asked the provider to make improvements regarding the systems to ensure X-ray equipment did not present any risks to patients and to ensure the quality assurance systems clearly identified serious risks to patients. We checked these areas at a further inspection carried out on 9 May 2014 and found the required improvements had been made.

We carried out this inspection in response to a number of complaints and concerns received through CQC Share Your Experience forms regarding the dental services provided at the medical centre. This inspection was a joined inspection carried out on a different day with CQC hospitals directorate.

The medical centre is open Monday to Friday from 9.00am-9.00pm and from 10.00am-9.00pm on Saturday and Sunday. The dental care facilities include three dental consultation rooms, a reception and waiting area, a decontamination room and a staff room. There is a small step to enter the premises and there is limited space for people who use a wheelchair or mobility aids.

We were not able to speak with patients during this inspection.

The provider has employed a person to manage the medical centre and they are the registered manager. A registered manager is a person who is registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the practice is run.

Our key findings were:

  • Patients were involved in their care and treatment planning so they could make informed decisions.
  • There were processes in place to reduce and minimise the risk and spread of infection, although improvements were required.
  • There was appropriate equipment and access to emergency drugs to enable the practice to respond to medical emergencies. Staff knew where this equipment was stored.
  • There was appropriate, well-maintained equipment for staff to undertake their duties.
  • The provider did not have effective systems to monitor and improve quality, as was evident from the lack of routine audits in key areas, such as radiography, infection prevention and control and dental care records.
  • There was lack of clinical oversight and effective monitoring of staff training and their continuous professional development (CPD) in line with General Dental Council (GDC) requirements.

We identified regulations that were not being met and the provider must:

  • Ensure the training, learning and development needs of individual staff members are reviewed at appropriate intervals and an effective process is established for the on-going assessment and supervision of all staff.

  • Ensure audits of various aspects of the service, such as radiography, are undertaken at regular intervals to help improve the quality of service. The service should also check all audits have documented learning points where necessary and the resulting improvements can be demonstrated.

You can see full details of the regulations not being met at the end of this report.

There were areas where the provider could make improvements and should:

  • Review the practice’s arrangements for receiving and responding to patient safety alerts, recalls and rapid response reports issued from the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) and through the Central Alerting System (CAS), as well as from other relevant bodies, such as Public Health England (PHE).
  • Review the practice’s infection control procedures and protocols giving due regard to guidelines issued by the Department of Health - Health Technical Memorandum 01-05: Decontamination in primary care dental practices and The Health and Social Care Act 2008: ‘Code of Practice about the prevention and control of infections and related guidance’.
  • Review the practice's waste handling protocols to ensure waste is segregated and disposed of in accordance with relevant regulations giving due regard to guidance issued in the Health Technical Memorandum 07-01 (HTM 07-01).
  • Review the practice’s sharps procedures giving due regard to the Health and Safety (Sharp Instruments in Healthcare) Regulations 2013.
  • Review the practice’s protocols for recording in the patients’ dental care records or elsewhere the reason for taking the X-ray and quality of the X-ray giving due regard to the Ionising Radiation (Medical Exposure) Regulations (IR(ME)R) 2000.
  • Review the practice's protocols for completion of dental care records giving due regard to guidance provided by the Faculty of General Dental Practice regarding clinical examinations and record keeping.

Review staff awareness of the requirements of the Mental Capacity Act (MCA) 2005 and ensure all staff are aware of their responsibilities under the Act as it relates to their role. 

30 November 2015

During an inspection looking at part of the service

Our focused inspection on 30 November 2015 followed up an inspection in October 2014 where weaknesses in processes had been identified. The provider suspended the service for some months and restarted termination of pregnancy in June 2015. We inspected the service as it runs now that a, new gynaecologist is in post.

At our last inspection there had not been a registered manager RM). There was now an RM who had been in post since 4 September 2015. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Registered managers have responsibility for meeting the legal requirements in the Health and Social Care Act and associated Regulations in the running of the service.

We found that the provider was meeting the requirements of the Department of Health for a termination of pregnancy service.

We looked at the care and treatment records of women using the service, talked to staff, and reviewed other documentation to ensure that the processes safeguarded women’s safety and welfare.

During a check to make sure that the improvements required had been made

At our inspection visits carried out on 28 January 2014 and 21 February 2014 we were concerned that the provider had not made suitable arrangements to protect people from the risks of harm by the use of unsafe equipment in the laboratory. We found laboratory equipment which may not have been suitable for use in the United Kingdom. There was a shortage of plug sockets and extension leads with trailing wires were being used. There was no evidence of Portable Electrical Appliance testing of the laboratory equipment.

After this inspection the provider wrote to us and told us they were no longer providing laboratory services at Tooting Medical Centre. We carried out a further inspection on 7 October and found improvements had been made. There was no evidence of laboratory equipment being used at Tooting Medical Centre to test blood samples. Staff described the process they used to send blood samples away from the medical centre for testing. We saw the provider had developed procedures for staff to follow. Suitable personal protective equipment was provided and separate cold storage facilities were available when required.

7 October 2014

During an inspection looking at part of the service

This follow up inspection only focused on the regulated activity termination of pregnancy.

Our previous inspection visits on 28 January and 21 February 2014 had identified issues with the provider's ability to carry out termination of pregnancy. We had found conflicting information in the provider's policies, procedures and pathways; suitable arrangements were not in place to deal with medical emergencies, obtaining consent and providing counselling. Arrangements were not in place for the disposal of human tissue, staff had not completed training in termination of pregnancy and records were not in place when the gynaecologist was away from the medical centre which could lead to patients receiving inappropriate or unsafe care or treatment.

We carried out a further inspection on 14 July 2014 to see if the provider was ready to provide termination of pregnancy. Although improvements had been made, there remained inconsistencies between policies and pathway documents. There were not enough staff to provide termination of pregnancies. The counsellors were not providing full time cover, as required by the Department of Health 'Required Standard Operating Procedures'. In addition, the on-call handover arrangements were inappropriate because there was no system to handover the telephone between doctors and there was over 34 hours with no covering doctor. While progress had been made with the disposal of foetal tissue, arrangements were not in place for it to be buried if patients wished. At the time of our inspection, there was no registered manager for the regulated activity, which was a condition of the provider's registration with the Care Quality Commission, although an application was being processed by the Commission.

Our visit of 7 October 2014 found improvements had been made to policies, procedures and pathways, which were now in line with good practice guidelines and gave patients and staff consistent information about the process. A new gynaecologist had been employed to work three days a week and provide clinical oversight of terminations. Two local counsellors had been approached to provide counselling to women if they wanted it at any time during the process. Procedures for dealing with medical emergencies were improved because the doctors would be working together and a system was now in place to hand over the telephone, for women to ring in the event of an emergency. Systems were in place for audits of terminations to include learning from issues and sharing information with staff. At the time of our inspection, the provider did not have a registered manager for any of the regulated activities, which remains a condition of their registration with the Commission, although an application had been submitted.

4 July 2014

During an inspection looking at part of the service

Our inspection carried out on 28 January and 21 February 2014 found the provider was operating a laboratory which was not fit for purpose. We sent a notice to impose a condition on the providers registration to prevent them from carrying on a laboratory. We also found the system to obtain medicines was not appropriate. The provider sent an action plan dated 16 May 2014 to say they had made the required improvements to medicines management and they were no longer providing laboratory services. They confirmed that laboratory machines had been removed and the room was to be used for beauty treatments. We carried out a further inspection on 11 March 2014 and found the quality assurance systems had failed to identify serious risks with the x-ray equipment. The provider wrote to us and told us that they had put systems in place for checking x-ray equipment at the medical centre.

We carried out this short notice announced visit 4 July 2014 to check the systems in place for medicines management, the process for samples to be sent to a laboratory for testing and the quality assurance systems in place for these. We found improvements had been made. The centre managers ordered medicines from a local pharmacy when the doctors requested. The balance of two medicines checked were correct. The provider had a contract with a laboratory for testing blood samples and we were talked through how the process worked. We found there was no equipment at the medical centre for carrying out tests on blood samples. Quality assurance systems were in place to seek patients views on the services provided and contracts for checking equipment.

14 July 2014

During an inspection looking at part of the service

This follow up inspection only focused on the regulated activity termination of pregnancy and took place following our visits of 28 January and 21 February 2014 which identified issues with the provider's ability to provide this activity. We found conflicting information in policies, procedures and pathways which could lead to patients receiving inappropriate or unsafe care and treatment. Suitable arrangements were not in place to deal with medical emergencies. There were issues regarding consent; arrangements for counselling were not clear; arrangements were not in place for the disposal of human tissue; staff had not completed training in termination of pregnancy; and records were not in place when the gynaecologist was away from the medical centre. There was no registered manager and the nominated individual lacked understanding of termination of pregnancy.

Our visit of 14 July found that whilst the provider had made some changes in preparation to provide the regulated activity termination of pregnancy, they were not ready to do so. Although improvements had been made to the policies, procedures and pathways, there remained inconsistencies between these documents. There were not enough staff to provide terminations because the gynaecologist who carried out the procedure worked every other weekend, Saturday afternoon and Sunday morning. The counsellors were not providing full time cover, as required by the Department of Health Required Standard Operating Procedures. In addition, the on-call handover arrangements were inappropriate because there was no system to pass the telephone between doctors and there was over 34 hours with no doctor covering. While progress had been made with the disposal of foetal tissue, arrangements were not in place for it to be buried if patients wished. The medicines policy did not include guidance around the recording of the prescription before it was dispensed, checking of the medicine as it was administered and the signature required once administered. At the time of our inspection, there was no registered manager for the regulated activity, which was a condition of the provider's registration with CQC, although an application was being processed by CQC.

9 May 2014

During an inspection looking at part of the service

At our last inspection of the service on the 11 March 2014 we identified serious concerns with the x-ray equipment in use at Tooting Medical Centre. We found the provider had not ensured this equipment was safe or suitable to use and as such put people at risk of receiving inappropriate, unsafe care. There were also unacceptable risks of potential exposure to radiation because equipment was not being properly maintained.

We took enforcement action and issued a warning notice to the provider as they had failed to comply with Regulation 16 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2010.

We carried out this inspection to check that the provider had taken appropriate steps to comply with the warning notice. The inspection team consisted of two compliance inspectors, an IR(ME)R (Ionising Radiation (Medical Exposure) Regulations) inspector and a Polish interpreter. The IR(ME)R inspector has powers to monitor and inspect, under The Health and Safety at Work Act (HSWA), premises that use ionising radiation and to gather information about whether the requirements of IR(ME)R are being met.

During this inspection we found appropriate action had been taken by the provider to achieve compliance with Regulation 16. We saw the provider had made suitable arrangements for servicing and maintenance of the three intra oral x 'ray machines at the centre. This gave the provider assurance these machines were safe and suitable to use.

The provider had removed from the service another x-ray machine which was not fit for purpose. This no longer posed a risk to people using the service.

Improvements had been made to the way information was relayed to staff which gave assurance that changes in working practices and procedures were communicated effectively.

The provider had carried out testing of radiation dose levels and these were found to be low. This gave the provider assurance they needed that there were acceptable levels of exposure at the service.

28 January and 21 February 2014

During an inspection in response to concerns

We visited Tooting Medical Service with a Polish Interpreter following concerns raised from more than one source about the procedures for termination of pregnancy at the service. The service was registered for the regulated activity ‘Termination of Pregnancies’ on 24 December 2013. We visited the service on 28 January 2014 to follow up on these concerns. We were told that the registered manager was on leave for three weeks.

We found that the necessary approval from the Secretary of State to carry out termination of pregnancies had not been applied for. This is required by law under the Abortion Act 19679 (1) (3). We were then told by the provider and the gynaecologist that one or two appointments had been made but no procedures had been carried out. Following this inspection an application was made by the provider to the Department of Health for the required approval from the Secretary of State to carry out termination of pregnancies. At the time of writing this report it was understood that approval has not yet been granted.

We also found there were concerns with the readiness of the service to deliver this regulated activity safely in full compliance with regulations from the Department of Health and legal requirements. While policies and procedures were being developed they had not yet been completed. We sought advice from a specialist advisor.

Following our visit on 28 January 2014 we received new information that raised further allegations about whether terminations of pregnancies were carried out illegally. These allegations have passed to the Police for their own investigations under the Abortion Act 1967. We also received a complaint about test results from a member of the public. The website for Tooting Medical Centre advertised a wide range of laboratory testing carried out on site.

We revisited the medical centre on 21 February 2014 accompanied by specialist advisors for gynaecology and biomedical science, a pharmacist, an interpreter and the Police. The Police investigation remains in progress. At these inspections we spoke with staff and looked at records.

We found there were serious concerns about the laboratory at the medical centre and about the provider’s compliance with requirements for termination of pregnancies as well as the readiness of the provider to deliver termination of pregnancies safely. These concerns have been detailed within the report.

11 March 2014

During an inspection in response to concerns

The Commission previously inspected the termination of pregnancies and laboratory services at Tooting Medical Centre in January and February 2014. At these inspections we identified major concerns and breaches in regulation, which we have subsequently notified the provider of.

We undertook this inspection because we received further information of concern about the safety of x-ray equipment at Tooting Medical Centre, the disposal of chemicals used in the production of x-ray images, staff recruitment, staff qualifications, professional indemnity insurance and the management arrangements for the service in the absence of a registered manager. The inspection team consisted of two compliance inspectors, an IR(ME)R (Ionising Radiation (Medical Exposure) Regulations) inspector and a Polish interpreter.

The IR(ME)R inspector has powers to monitor and inspect, under The Health and Safety at Work Act (HSWA), premises that use ionising radiation and to gather information about whether the requirements of IR(ME)R are being met. Where we have evidence that employers and other duty holders are not currently meeting their legal obligations under IR(ME)R, or have demonstrated repeated non-compliance over time, we will consider taking action.

We found appropriate checks were undertaken before staff began work. Staff had the relevant qualifications to carry out their roles and received further appropriate training. We also found that the nominated individual had arrangements to manage the service as well as plans to recruit and appoint new managers for the service.

However we had serious concerns about the safety and suitability of all of the x-ray machines used by the service. The provider had not taken appropriate steps to ensure x-ray equipment was safe and as such put people using the service at risk of receiving inappropriate or unsafe care from the use of unsuitable equipment. People were put at unacceptable risk of exposure to radiation because the provider had failed to take appropriate action to repair and maintain equipment they knew to be unsafe.

10 July 2013

During a routine inspection

The service mainly but not exclusively serves the Polish community. We were told that the majority of the patients who attended did so on a 'walk in' basis. We spoke with five people who used the service and they all spoke highly about it and the treatment they had. One person told us “it’s super here I have had great treatment. A friend told me about it and now I have recommended two of my friends.” Another person said “it is my first time here and I would definitely come again.”

People told us they were happy with the care and treatment they received and that they felt safe here.

We looked around the centre and saw that it was clean and people we spoke with confirmed this. One person told us “It’s very clean; I’m a spa manager so I know what I am looking for. Everyone seems very nice, very friendly…” We saw that there were effective infection control procedures in place. There were systems in place for the storage and handling of medication. The premises were well maintained and appropriate checks were made.

We spoke with some of the health professionals who were there that day and other staff at the centre We looked at some of the staff records and saw that correct recruitment procedures were followed. There was evidence that staff training was up to date and there were adequate systems for quality assurance in place. During the inspection we used the service of an interpreter where this was needed