Background to this inspection
Updated
26 September 2018
We carried out this inspection under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 as part of our regulatory functions. This inspection checked whether the provider is meeting the legal requirements and regulations associated with the Health and Social Care Act 2008, to look at the overall quality of the service, and to provide a rating for the service under the Care Act 2014.
The inspection site visit took place on 6 September 2018. We gave the service two working days’ notice of the inspection as the service provides a domiciliary care service and we needed to be sure that someone would be available at the office.
The inspection site visit was carried out by one inspector.
We looked at the providers Statement of Purpose. This is a document providing information as to the aims and objectives of the service, the support and services it provides and to who.
We looked at the information held about the provider and the service including statutory notifications and enquiries relating to the service. Statutory notifications include information about important events which the provider is required to send us. We used this information to help us plan this inspection.
We spoke with one person who used the service by telephone on 7 September 2018. We spoke with three family members by telephone on 7 and 10 September 2018.
We spoke with a partner of the service when we visited the office and gathered the views of staff.
We looked at the care plans and records of three people. We looked three staff records, which included their recruitment, induction, on-going monitoring and training. We looked at the minutes of staff meetings and records related to the quality monitoring of the service.
Updated
26 September 2018
Sahara-Care Agency is a domiciliary care agency providing personal care to older people and younger adults in their own homes across Derby. This included people with physical disabilities and mental health needs. Sahara Care specialises in supporting people from an Asian background. The agency is located close to Derby city centre. At the time of the inspection, the service was providing support for nine people and employed five members of staff.
Sahara-Care Agency had a registered manager. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.
Sahara-Care Agency has been previously inspected under a different legal entity. Sahara-Care Agency was registered as a partnership in September 2017 and this is the first inspection carried out under the new legal entity.
People’s safety was promoted by staff who implemented the guidance as detailed within people’s risk assessments and care plans. People were supported by staff that had been recruited and had checks undertaken to ensure they were suitable for their role. People’s medicine was managed safely and people received their medicine on time.
People’s needs were assessed to ensure the service and staff could meet these. The level of support people received was dependent upon their needs, which included support to meet people’s cultural needs. We found, people were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrict way possible; the policies and systems in the service supported this practice. People receiving a service were encouraged to maintain their independence.
Staff received support from the management team, through supervision and checks to ensure they were competent to carry out their roles effectively. Staff received the training they needed to provide safe and effective care to people.
People using the service and family members spoke of the positive relationships they had developed with staff. People’s comments and that of their family members evidenced how these relationships had supported people, in gaining confidence. People’s dignity and privacy was promoted.
People’s views, and those of their family members had been sought to develop and review peoples care. The registered person had not received any concerns or complaints, they had received a number of compliments about the service. People’s care plans had considered the individual needs of each person and the role of staff in meeting these, with a strong emphasis on meeting people’s cultural and diverse needs. People, were supported to access services within the community to meet their religious needs.
People’s communication needs were considered when developing care plans, which included information as to how people communicated, people were supported by staff who were able to converse in their preferred language. Information about the service, which included key policies and procedures was provided in Hindi, English and Punjabi.
Systems were in place to monitor the quality of the care being provided, which included seeking the views of those using the service and family members. The outcome of questionnaires was analysed and shared with people using the service in an annual newsletter. A range of audits were undertaken to evidence the quality of the care. These included the supervision of staff, the findings of which were analysed and shared with people annually within a written report.