The Care Quality Commission
  • Doctor
  • Independent doctor

Heart Networks UK Limited

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

299 Alan Turing Way, Manchester, Lancashire, M11 3BS 07951 725356

Provided and run by:
Heart Networks UK Limited

All Inspections

6 July 2023

During a monthly review of our data

We carried out a review of the data available to us about Heart Networks UK Limited on 6 July 2023. We have not found evidence that we need to carry out an inspection or reassess our rating at this stage.

This could change at any time if we receive new information. We will continue to monitor data about this service.

If you have concerns about Heart Networks UK Limited, you can give feedback on this service.

16 February 2022

During a routine inspection

This service is rated as Good overall. (Previous inspection September 2018 – not rated)

The key questions are rated as:

Are services safe? – Good

Are services effective? – Good

Are services caring? – Good

Are services responsive? – Good

Are services well-led? – Good

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at Heart Networks UK Limited on 16 February 2022. This inspection was part of the CQC inspection programme to check whether the provider was meeting the legal requirements and regulations associated with the Health and Social Care Act 2008.

Heart Networks UK Limited are a community-based cardiology service working in partnership with the NHS, to provide a primary care led heart service. Patients are referred by their GP for assessment.

Our key findings were:

  • The provider had good systems to manage risk so that safety incidents were less likely to happen. When they did happen, the provider learned from them and improved their processes.
  • The provider reviewed the effectiveness and appropriateness of the care it provided. It ensured that care and treatment was delivered according to evidence-based guidelines.
  • Systems were in place to deal with medical emergencies and staff were trained in basic life support.
  • There were systems in place to reduce risks to patient safety. For example, infection control practices were carried out appropriately and there were regular checks on the environment and on equipment used.
  • Staff were appropriately trained and experienced to deliver effective care and treatment.
  • Staff had access to all standard operating procedures and policies.
  • The location of the service provided appropriate facilities for patients, including disabled access.
  • There was a clear leadership and staff structure and staff understood their roles and responsibilities.
  • The provider had a clear vision to provide a safe and high-quality service.
  • There were clinical governance systems and processes in place to ensure the quality of service provision.
  • Staff involved and treated people with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect. Patient feedback highlighted high levels of satisfaction.
  • Patients could access care and treatment from the provider within an appropriate timescale for their needs.
  • Information about the provider and how to raise concerns was available.
  • There was a strong focus on innovation, continuous learning and improvement at all levels of the organisation.

Dr Rosie Benneyworth BM BS BMedSci MRCGP
Chief Inspector of Primary Medical Services and Integrated Care

19 and 27 September 2018

During a routine inspection

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at Heart Networks UK Limited on 19 and 27 September 2018 to ask the service the following key questions; Are services safe, effective, caring, responsive and well-led.

Our findings were:

Are services safe?

We found that this service was providing safe care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services effective?

We found that this service was providing effective care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services caring?

We found that this service was providing caring services in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services responsive?

We found that this service was providing responsive care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services well-led?

We found that this service was providing well-led care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

We carried out this inspection under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 as part of our regulatory functions. This inspection was planned to check whether the service was meeting the legal requirements and regulations associated with the Health and Social Care Act 2008.

The service has a registered manager. A registered manager is a person who is registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

The service provides a cardiology assessment service to patients living in north and central Manchester.

Our key findings were:

  • The service had clear systems to keep people safe and safeguarded from abuse. Staff understood their responsibilities to raise concerns and report incidents and near misses.
  • A system was in place for reporting, investigating and learning from significant events and incidents.
  • Systems were in place to deal with medical emergencies and staff were trained in basic life support.
  • There were systems in place to reduce risks to patient safety. For example, infection control practices were carried out appropriately and there were regular checks on the environment and on equipment used.
  • Staff assessed patients’ needs and delivered care in line with current evidence based guidance.
  • Patient comment cards included very positive feedback about the service and patients felt they had been treated with dignity and respect and involved in decisions about their care and treatment.
  • Patients were provided with information about their health along with advice and guidance to support them to live healthier lives.
  • Systems were in place to protect personal information about patients.
  • Staff were appropriately trained and experienced to deliver effective care and treatment.
  • Staff had access to all standard operating procedures and policies.
  • The service encouraged and acted on feedback from both patients and staff. Patient survey information we reviewed showed that people who used the service had given positive feedback about their experience.
  • Information about services and how to complain was available. Improvements were made as a result of complaints and feedback from patients.
  • The location of the service provided appropriate facilities for patients, including disabled access.
  • There was a clear leadership and staff structure and staff understood their roles and responsibilities.
  • The provider had a clear vision to provide a safe and high-quality service.
  • There were clinical governance systems and processes in place to ensure the quality of service provision.

Professor Steve Field CBE FRCP FFPH FRC GP

Chief Inspector of General Practice