Updated 23 October 2020
The inspection
We carried out this inspection under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (the Act) as part of our regulatory functions. We checked whether the provider was meeting the legal requirements and regulations associated with the Act. We looked at the overall quality of the service and provided a rating for the service under the Care Act 2014.
This was a focused inspection to check whether the provider had met the actions of the requirement notice in relation to Regulation 12 (Safe care and treatment) and Regulation 17 (Good governance) of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014.
Inspection team
The inspection activity was completed by one inspector and an Expert by Experience (ExE). An EXE is a person who has personal experience of using or caring for someone who uses this type of care service.
Service and service type
This service is a domiciliary care agency. It provides personal care to people living in their own houses and flats.
The service had two managers registered with the Care Quality Commission. This means that they, and the provider are legally responsible for how the service is run and for the quality and safety of the care provided.
Notice of inspection
We gave the service 48 hours’ notice of the inspection. This was because it is a small service and we needed to be sure that the provider or registered managers would be in the office to support the inspection. The inspection activity commenced on 7 August 2020 and we carried out a site inspection on 17 September 2020.
What we did before the inspection
We reviewed information we had received about the service since the last inspection. We sought feedback from the local authority. The provider was not asked to complete a provider information return prior to this inspection. This is information we require providers to send us to give some key information about the service, what the service does well and improvements they plan to make. We took this into account when we inspected the service and made the judgements in this report. We spoke with the provider and requested a range of documentation relating to the safety and management of the service and training data. We looked at 10 people’s care records. The ExE spoke with 11people and six relatives by telephone. We used all of this information to plan our inspection.
During the inspection
On the day of the inspection, we spoke with both registered managers and a care coordinator. We spoke with four members of staff and the provider. We followed up information we had reviewed whilst planning the inspection. We also reviewed seven medicine administration records and ten care plans.
After the inspection:
We continued to seek clarification from the provider to validate evidence found. We received feedback from four staff on their views about the service. We discussed our initial findings via a teleconference call on 22 September with both registered managers and on 25 September with the provider.