9 November 2023
During an inspection looking at part of the service
We carried out an announced focused inspection at Eskdaill Medical on 9 November. Overall, the practice is rated as good.
Safe - good
Effective - good
Caring – not inspected
Responsive - good
Well-led - good
Following our previous inspection on 9 February 2016, the practice was rated good overall and for all key questions.
The full reports for previous inspections can be found by selecting the ‘all reports’ link for Eskdaill Medical on our website at www.cqc.org.uk
Why we carried out this inspection
We carried out this inspection in line with our inspection priorities.
How we carried out the inspection/review
This inspection was carried out in a way which enabled us to spend a minimum amount of time on site.
This included:
- Conducting staff interviews using video conferencing.
- Completing clinical searches on the practice’s patient records system (this was with consent from the provider and in line with all data protection and information governance requirements).
- Reviewing patient records to identify issues and clarify actions taken by the provider.
- Requesting evidence from the provider.
- A short site visit.
Our findings
We based our judgement of the quality of care at this service on a combination of:
- what we found when we inspected
- information from our ongoing monitoring of data about services and
- information from the provider, patients, the public and other organisations.
We found that:
- The practice provided care in a way that kept patients safe and protected them from avoidable harm.
- Patients received effective care and treatment that met their needs.
- Staff dealt with patients with kindness and respect and involved them in decisions about their care.
- The way the practice was led and managed promoted the delivery of high-quality, person-centre care.
- Feedback from staff was pre-dominantly positive about working in the practice and the support they received from the GPs and practice management.
- National GP Patient survey data indicated patients were not always satisfied with access to the practice and appointments. However, feedback gathered from patients as part of the inspection was more positive.
- The practice were below targets for the uptake 3 of the 5 childhood immunisations and cervical screening. Measures had been put in place to increase the uptake.
Whilst we found no breaches of regulations, the provider should:
- Continue to take measures to increase the uptake of childhood immunisations and cervical screening.
- Continue to take measures to increase patient satisfaction with access to the practice and suitable appointment availability.
- Embed and sustain the measures already in place to improve access to the practice.
Details of our findings and the evidence supporting our ratings are set out in the evidence tables.
Dr Sean O’Kelly BSc MB ChB MSc DCH FRCA
Chief Inspector of Health Care