Archived: Dr Lumley & Partners

Letter from the Chief Inspector of General Practice

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at Dr Lumley and Partners on 17 January 2017. Overall the practice is rated as good.

Our key findings across all the areas we inspected were as follows:

• There was an open and transparent approach to safety and an effective system in place for reporting and recording significant events.

• Risks to patients were assessed and generally well managed.

• Staff assessed patients’ needs and delivered care in line with current evidence based guidance. Staff had been trained to provide them with the skills, knowledge and experience to deliver effective care and treatment.
• Patients said they were treated with compassion, dignity and respect and they were involved in their care and decisions about their treatment.
• Information about services and how to complain was available and easy to understand. Improvements were made to the quality of care as a result of complaints and concerns.
• Patients said they found it easy to make an appointment with a named GP and there was continuity of care, with urgent appointments available the same day.
• The practice had good facilities and was well equipped to treat patients and meet their needs.
• There was a clear leadership structure and staff felt supported by management. The practice proactively sought feedback from staff and patients, which it acted on.
• The provider was aware of and complied with the requirements of the duty of candour.

We saw one area of outstanding practice:

• A thorough process was used to ensure all staff remained up to date with NICE guidelines action taken and any learning outcomes.

The areas where the provider should consider making improvements are:-

• Leaflets for patients should be printed in a size suitable for people with visual impairment .

• A risk assessment should be completed regarding the lack of appropriate medicines in the Doctors bags for use in an emergency situation on a home visit.

• Strengthen arrangements for quality improvement by evaluating the impact of clinical audits.

• The patient participation group (PPG) should be developed to represent the voice of patients.

Professor Steve Field (CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP) 

Chief Inspector of General Practice