- GP practice
Northfield Surgery
All Inspections
During an assessment under our new approach
23 May 2023
During a routine inspection
We carried out an unannounced comprehensive inspection at Northfield Surgery on 25 May 2023. Overall, the practice is rated as inadequate.
Safe - inadequate
Effective - inadequate
Caring - requires improvement
Responsive - inadequate
Well-led - inadequate
Following our previous inspection on 15 January 2018, the practice was rated good overall and for all key questions.
The full reports for previous inspections can be found by selecting the ‘all reports’ link for Northfield Surgery on our website at www.cqc.org.uk
Why we carried out this inspection.
We carried out this comprehensive inspection in response to risk following receipt of information of concern.
How we carried out the inspection
This inspection was carried out in a way which enabled us to spend a minimum amount of time on site.
This included:
- Conducting staff interviews using video conferencing.
- Completing clinical searches on the practice’s patient records system (this was with consent from the provider and in line with all data protection and information governance requirements).
- Reviewing patient records to identify issues and clarify actions taken by the provider.
- Requesting evidence from the provider.
- A single day site visit.
Our findings
We based our judgement of the quality of care at this service on a combination of:
- what we found when we inspected
- information from our ongoing monitoring of data about services and
- information from the provider, patients, the public and other organisations.
We found that the practice:
- Was unable to demonstrate that safe systems or practices were in place or working effectively in relation to medicines management, safeguarding, recruitment, or the management of risks to patients or staff.
- Was unable to demonstrate that action taken to address below target uptake for childhood immunisation and cervical screening had led to any improvements in these data. Additionally, the practice was unable to demonstrate that patients’ needs were always met, that staffing was effective or that they had actively engaged in joined up working.
- Was unable to demonstrate that they had taken action to address poor satisfaction of patients who responded to the GP patient survey, or those patients in their internal survey that were less satisfied than others. They were also unable to demonstrate that a carers register was in place or was being used to provide caring services for those patients.
- Was unable to demonstrate that they had taken appropriate actions to address lower areas of satisfaction from patient feedback or to demonstrate that any actions had been taken to record or address complaints. Furthermore, we saw that there was a decline in patient satisfaction over time in previous surveys and there was no system in place to address this.
- Systems and process in place were not working as intended, overseen effectively or structured in a way that enabled the provider to fulfil their responsibilities to the practice population. Clinical and non-clinical leadership were unable to demonstrate adequate capacity to deliver high-quality or fully safe services which had led to significant gaps throughout the service.
We found breaches of regulations. The provider must:
- Ensure care and treatment is provided in a safe way to patients.
- Establish effective systems and processes to ensure good governance in accordance with the fundamental standards of care.
the provider should also:
- Take steps to address low uptake in cervical screening and childhood immunisations.
- Review all areas of patient satisfaction survey data and address concerns raised.
- Ensure vulnerable patients including all carers, all people with a learning disability and other vulnerable patients are identified and appropriately supported.
A final version of this report, which we will publish in due course, will include full information about our regulatory response to the concerns we have described.
I am placing this service in special measures. Services placed in special measures will be inspected again within six months. If insufficient improvements have been made such that there remains a rating of inadequate for any key question or overall, we will take action in line with our enforcement procedures to begin the process of preventing the provider from operating the service. This will lead to cancelling their registration or to varying the terms of their registration within six months if they do not improve.
The service will be kept under review and if needed could be escalated to urgent enforcement action. Where necessary, another inspection will be conducted within a further six months, and if there is not enough improvement, we will move to close the service by adopting our proposal to remove this location or cancel the provider’s registration.
Special measures will give people who use the service the reassurance that the care they get should improve.
Details of our findings and the evidence supporting our ratings are set out in the evidence tables.
Dr Sean O’Kelly BSc MB ChB MSc
15 January 2018
During a routine inspection
Letter from the Chief Inspector of General Practice
This practice is rated as good overall. (Previous inspection 31 August 2016 – Good)
The key questions are rated as:
Are services safe? – Good
Are services effective? – Good
Are services caring? – Good
Are services responsive? – Good
Are services well-led? - Good
As part of our inspection process, we also look at the quality of care for specific population groups. The population groups are rated as:
Older People – Good
People with long-term conditions – Good
Families, children and young people – Good
Working age people (including those retired and students) – Good
People whose circumstances may make them vulnerable – Good
People experiencing poor mental health (including people living with dementia) - Good
We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at Northfield Surgery on 15 January 2018 as part of our inspection programme.
We found one area of outstanding practice:
- Staff had liaised with the different types of patient traveller groups and had developed Romany traveller and traveller patient participation groups which met every six months. Staff were working with the groups to increase the awareness and importance of immunisations and NHS screening services and to provide feedback on the services the practice offered.
At this inspection we found:
- The practice had clear systems to manage risk so that safety incidents were less likely to happen. When incidents did happen, the practice learned from them and improved their processes.
- The practice routinely reviewed the effectiveness and appropriateness of the care it provided. It ensured that care and treatment was delivered according to evidence- based guidelines.
- We saw staff involved and treated patients with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect. The practice had historically low patient satisfaction scores from the GP national patient survey. However, the provider had developed an action plan to address the issues.
- A new telephone system had been installed to improve telephone access to the practice. Care navigation had also been introduced and patients told us improvements had been seen.
- There was a strong focus on continuous learning and improvement at all levels of the organisation.
The areas where the provider should make improvements are:
- Provide a chaperone training update for healthcare assistants.
- Consider developing a schedule for continuous quality improvement activity and include review dates.
- Review the process to respond to complaints to ensure that it includes keeping records of all investigations undertaken.
Professor Steve Field CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP
Chief Inspector of General Practice
31 August 2016
During an inspection looking at part of the service
Letter from the Chief Inspector of General Practice
We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection of this practice on 5 January 2016. A breach of a legal requirement was found. After the comprehensive inspection, the practice wrote to us to say what they would do to meet the legal requirements in relation to the regulatory breaches of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) 2014 Regulation 16 Receiving and acting on complaints.
We undertook this focused inspection on 31 August 2016 to check that they had followed their plan and to confirm that they now met the legal requirements.
This report only covers our findings in relation to those requirements. You can read the report from our last comprehensive inspection, by selecting the 'all reports' link for Northfield Surgery on our website at www.cqc.org.uk.
Overall the practice is rated as Good.
Specifically,following the focused inspection we found the practice to be good for providing responsive services and for those people experiencing poor mental health (including people living with dementia).
- The practice had reviewed the care provided to patients with poor mental health. Of those with complex mental health problems 98% had an agreed care plan in place for the quality outcomes framework year 2015/16.
- The practice identified those patients with poor mental health who did not attend appointments and offered flexible appointment times or agreed weekly pre-arranged appointments with a named GP.
- The practice had reviewed it the complaint procedures and information was available and easy to understand. In addition to contacting the practice manager in person and writing to the practice, an email address had been created for patients to provide feedback to the practice online. Improvements were made to the quality of care as a result of complaints and concerns.
Professor Steve Field CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP
Chief Inspector of General Practice
5 January 2016
During a routine inspection
Letter from the Chief Inspector of General Practice
We carried out a follow up inspection on 5 January 2016 at Northfield Surgery as a result of the practice currently being in special measures due to non-compliance with the Health & Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014 following our previous inspection in January and February 2015.
During this inspection in January 2016, we found the practice had made significant improvements since our last inspection in January and February 2015 and that they were meeting all of the three requirement notices which had previously been breached. The ratings for the practice have been updated to reflect our findings. However the provider is in breach of Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulation 16 HSCA (RA) Regulations 2014 Receiving and acting on complaints.
The practice is rated as good overall for providing caring, safe, effective and well led service. It requires improvement for providing a responsive service.
Our key findings across all the areas we inspected were as follows:
- There was an open and transparent approach to safety and an effective system in place for reporting and recording significant events although records of actions taken could be improved.
- Risks to patients were assessed and managed.
- Staff assessed patients’ needs and delivered care in line with current evidence based guidance.
- Staff had the skills, knowledge and experience to deliver effective care and treatment.
- Patients said they were treated with compassion, dignity and respect and they were involved in their care and decisions about their treatment.
- Information about services and how to complain was available and easy to understand. The management of complaints could be improved to facilitate a timely response and provide details of investigations undertaken and the outcome in the response.
- Patients said they found it difficult to get through to the practice by telephone first thing in the morning to make an appointment. Urgent appointments filled up quickly.
- The practice had good facilities and was well equipped to treat patients and meet their needs.
- There was a new leadership structure and staff felt supported by management.
- The practice proactively sought feedback from staff and patients, which it acted on.
The areas where the provider must make improvement are:
- Ensure when dealing with complaints the process follows the Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman ‘Principles of Good Complaint Handling’ guidance.
In addition the provider should:
- Include all of the investigation, analysis and actions taken as a result of significant event analysis on the investigation record.
- Review safeguarding policies to include the names of practice safeguarding leads.
- Keep a central log of actions taken following National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidance and patient safety alerts.
- Review the outcomes for patients with depression and mental health conditions and take action to improve this.
- Document and review the longer term improvement actions in a business plan to monitor their progress.
I confirm that this practice has improved sufficiently to be rated ‘Good’ overall. The practice will be removed from special measures.
Professor Steve Field CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP
Chief Inspector of General Practice
28 January 2015 and 2 February 2015
During a routine inspection
Letter from the Chief Inspector of General Practice
We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at Northfield Surgery on 28 January 2015 and 2 February 2015. Overall the practice is rated as inadequate.
Specifically, we found the practice inadequate for providing safe effective services and being well led. They were also inadequate for providing services for the six population groups. Improvements were also required for providing caring and responsive services.
Our key findings across all the areas we inspected were as follows:
- The majority of staff understand and fulfilled their responsibilities to raise concerns, and to report incidents and near misses. Systems, processes and practices are not always reliably implemented to keep people safe.
- Information about safety is recorded and monitored but it not robustly reviewed.
- Risks to patients are not always assessed and risks are not well managed.
- Data showed patient clinical outcomes are below average for the locality. Although some audits have been carried out, we saw no evidence audits are driving improvement in performance to improve patient outcomes.
- Urgent appointments were usually available on the day they were requested but filled up very quickly. Patients reported it was very difficult to get through the practice when phoning to make an appointment.
- The practice had no clear leadership structure, insufficient leadership capacity and limited formal governance arrangements.
- The practice had a number of policies and procedures to govern activity, but these are new and had not been fully implemented. The practice does not hold regular governance meetings.
- The practice has not proactively sought feedback from staff.
- Patients said they are treated with compassion, dignity and respect and they are mostly involved in their care and decisions about their treatment.
- Information about services and how to complain are available and easy to understand.
The areas where the provider must make improvements in the following areas. The practice must:
- Ensure there is an effective system for reporting and recording significant events.
- Ensure audits of practice are used to drive improvement in performance to improve
patient outcomes.
-
Ensure there are formal governance arrangements in place including systems for assessing and monitoring risks and the quality of the service provision.
- Have a business continuity plan to deal with emergencies or major incidents, such as power failure, adverse weather or unplanned sickness, which may impact on the daily operation of the practice.
- Ensure all staff complete the practices mandatory training.
- Ensure staff have appropriate policies and guidance to carry out their roles in a safe and effective manner which are reflective of the requirements of the practice.
- Clarify the leadership structure and ensure there is leadership capacity to deliver all improvements
- Ensure fire evacuation drills are performed
In addition the provider should:
- Review the arrangements for privacy of patients in the reception area
- Review access arrangements for patients with respect to telephone access and appointments.
- Ensure there is a process in place to review locum work
- Ensure there is a process to track prescriptions through the practice
- Ensure patients are aware and can access information about chaperones
Professor Steve Field (CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP)
Chief Inspector of General Practice
8 November 2013
During an inspection looking at part of the service
As a result of that inspection we issued two warning notices and three compliance actions. These required the provider to make improvements in these areas in order to protect people.
We carried out this inspection to review the provider's progress with these required improvements. We found that significant improvements had been made. However, there were some areas that required further development and we will continue to monitor the provider's progress with this.
14, 27 August 2013
During a routine inspection
There had been a lack of consistent GPs since January 2013 and patients had difficulty obtaining timely appointments. We had concerns regarding the health and welfare of some patients.
Staff had not used safeguarding policies and procedures when a patient had raised a concern with them about their care in the community.
The practice was clean and tidy and there were systems in place to prevent and control the spread of infection. Comments from patients included, 'It's very clean and tidy."
Medicines were stored appropriately. We found shortfalls in the repeat prescribing processes which had resulted in one patient receiving medicine they were not supposed to have been prescribed.
Staff had access to training but there were some gaps in the training plan and appraisal system. Staff told us they did not feel supported as there was a lack of clear management structure, communication and consistent GPs.
There were shortfalls in systems to monitor the quality of the service provided to patients. This included checks and surveys to obtain patients views, management of complaints and learning from serious incidents so that improvements could be made.