• Doctor
  • GP practice

The Elmhurst Practice

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

South Woodford Health Centre, 114 High Road, South Woodford, London, E18 2QS (020) 8491 3310

Provided and run by:
The Elmhurst Practice

Latest inspection summary

On this page

Background to this inspection

Updated 31 March 2017

The Elmhurst Practice is located in a commercial area of the London Borough of Redbridge. The practice is located on the ground floor of a purpose-built health centre, which is shared with another GP practice. There is free parking on the streets nearest to the practice, and the practice has bays for parking for disabled patients at the side of the practice. The nearest bus stop is approximately three minutes’ walk from the practice.

There are approximately 5060 patients registered at the practice. Statistics show moderate to low income deprivation among the registered population. Information published by Public Health England rates the level of deprivation within the practice population group as eight on a scale of one to ten. Level one represents the highest levels of deprivation and level ten the lowest. The registered population is slightly higher than the national average for those aged between 5-14 and 35-59. Patients registered at the practice come from a variety of backgrounds including Asian, Western European, Eastern European and African Caribbean. 51% of patients have a long-standing health condition compared to the CCG average of 48%.

Care and treatment is delivered by five GPs (three female and two male) including four partners and one salaried GP who deliver twenty two clinical sessions weekly. There is one practice nurse (female) who delivers four sessions weekly. Five administrative and reception staff work at the practice and are led by a practice manager. The practice is training and teaching practice, and was hosting two trainee doctors on the day of the inspection.

The practice reception opening times are:-

  • 8:30am - 6:30pm (Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday, Friday)
  • 8:30am - 1pm (Thursday)

Clinical sessions are as follows:-

  • 9am - 12pm, 2pm - 6pm (Monday)
  • 9am - 11:30am, 3pm - 6pm (Tuesday),
  • 9am - 12pm, 3:30pm - 6pm (Wednesday)
  • 9am - 12pm (Thursday)
  • 9am – 12pm, 3:10pm - 6pm (Friday)

The practice does not offer extended hours surgery. Patients can book appointments in person, by telephone and online via the practice website.

Patients requiring a GP outside of practice opening hours are advised to contact the NHS GP out of hours service on telephone number 111.

The practice has a General Medical Services (GMS) contract. GMS contracts are nationally agreed between the General Medical Council and NHS England. The practice is registered to provide the following regulated activities:-

- Diagnostic and screening procedures

- Treatment of disease, disorder or injury

- Maternity and midwifery services

- Family planning

NHS Redbridge Clinical Commissioning Group (CCG) is the practice’s commissioning body.

The Elmhurst Practice has not previously been inspected by the CQC.

Overall inspection

Good

Updated 31 March 2017

Letter from the Chief Inspector of General Practice

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at The Elmhurst Practice on 20 December 2016. Overall the practice is rated as Good.

Our key findings across all the areas we inspected were as follows:

  • Staff assessed patients’ needs and delivered care in line with current evidence based guidance. Staff had been trained to provide them with the skills, knowledge and experience to deliver effective care and treatment.​
  • Patients said they found it easy to make an appointment with a named GP and there was continuity of care, with urgent appointments available the same day.
  • There was an open and transparent approach to safety and an effective system in place for reporting and recording significant events.
  • The practice ran a ‘one-stop clinic’ for patients with two or more long-term conditions. This was held annually and gave patients the opportunity to have discussions about their health needs with both the practice nurse and doctor.
  • Patients said they were treated with compassion, dignity and respect and they were involved in their care and decisions about their treatment.
  • Information about services and how to complain was available and easy to understand. Improvements were made to the quality of care as a result of complaints and concerns.
  • The practice had good facilities and was well equipped to treat patients and meet their needs. The facilities were based on the ground floor where patients could access clinical treatment rooms via wide corridors.
  • There was a clear leadership structure and staff felt supported by management. The practice proactively sought feedback from staff and patients, which it acted on.
  • The practice ran a yearly review clinic for patients with learning difficulties with an extended clinical session with a GP.
  • The provider was aware of and complied with the requirements of the duty of candour.
  • The practice had an active PPG, who with the practice management team hosted events to engage with the practice population and wider community.

Professor Steve Field (CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP) 

Chief Inspector of General Practice

People with long term conditions

Good

Updated 31 March 2017

The practice is rated as good for the care of people with long-term conditions.

  • Doctors and nursing staff had lead roles in chronic disease management and patients at risk of hospital admission were identified as a priority.
  • The Quality Outcomes Framework (QOF) recorded the practice as comparable to the CCG average on all three identified diabetes indicators. For example, the percentage of patients with diabetes, on the register, whose last measured total cholesterol (measured within the preceding 12 months) is 5 mmol/l or less was 75%, compared to the CCG average of 74% and the national average of 80%.
  • Longer appointments and home visits were available when needed.
  • Patients had a named GP and a structured annual review to check their health and medicines needs were being met. For those patients with the most complex needs, the named GP worked with relevant health and care professionals to deliver a multidisciplinary package of care.

Families, children and young people

Good

Updated 31 March 2017

The practice is rated as good for the care of families, children and young people.

  • There were systems in place to identify and follow up children living in disadvantaged circumstances and who were at risk, for example, children and young people who had a high number of A&E attendances. Immunisation rates were relatively high for all standard childhood immunisations.
  • Patients told us that children and young people were treated in an age-appropriate way and were recognised as individuals, and we saw evidence to confirm this.
  • 82% of women aged 25-64 notes record that a cervical screening test has been performed in the preceding 5 years which was comparable the CCG average of 78% and the national average of 82%.
  • Appointments were available outside of school hours and the premises were suitable for children and babies.
  • We saw positive examples of joint working with midwives and health visitors.

Older people

Good

Updated 31 March 2017

The practice is rated as good for the care of older people.

  • The practice offered proactive, personalised care to meet the needs of the older people in its population.
  • The practice was responsive to the needs of older people, and offered home visits and urgent appointments for those with enhanced needs.
  • Twenty minute appointments for this population group were standard.
  • Patients aged 75 or over had a named GP

Working age people (including those recently retired and students)

Good

Updated 31 March 2017

The practice is rated as good for the care of working-age people (including those recently retired and students).

  • The needs of the working age population, those recently retired and students had been identified and the practice had adjusted the services it offered to ensure these were accessible, flexible and offered continuity of care.
  • The practice was proactive in offering online services as well as a full range of health promotion and screening that reflects the needs for this age group.
  • Although the practice did not offer extended hours surgery, patients who required a face-to-face consultation with a clinician outside of normal working hours could have access to clinical staff through services provided by the local GP federation hub.
  • Telephone consultations with clinicians were available to meet the needs of this population group.

People experiencing poor mental health (including people with dementia)

Good

Updated 31 March 2017

The practice is rated as good for the care of people experiencing poor mental health (including people with dementia).

  • 90% of patients diagnosed with dementia who had their care reviewed in a face to face meeting in the last 12 months, which is higher than the national average of 84%
  • 88% of patients with schizophrenia, bipolar affective disorder and other psychoses who have a comprehensive, agreed care plan documented in their record in the preceding 12 months, which is the same as the national average of 88%.
  • The practice regularly worked with multi-disciplinary teams in the case management of patients experiencing poor mental health, including those with dementia.
  • The practice carried out advance care planning for patients with dementia.
  • The practice had told patients experiencing poor mental health about how to access various support groups and voluntary organisations.
  • Staff had a good understanding of how to support patients with mental health needs and dementia.

People whose circumstances may make them vulnerable

Good

Updated 31 March 2017

The practice is rated as good for the care of people whose circumstances may make them vulnerable.

  • The practice held a register of patients living in vulnerable circumstances including homeless people and those with a learning disability.
  • The practice offered longer appointments for patients with a learning disability. In addition, the practice ran a yearly review clinic for patients with learning difficulties who are given 30 minute appointments with a GP.
  • The practice regularly worked with other health care professionals in the case management of vulnerable patients.
  • Staff knew how to recognise signs of abuse in vulnerable adults and children. Staff were aware of their responsibilities regarding information sharing, documentation of safeguarding concerns and how to contact relevant agencies in normal working hours and out of hours.