We carried out an announced inspection at Olive Medical Practice on 11 August 2021.
Overall, the practice is rated as good.
Safe - good
Effective -good
Caring - good
Responsive – requires improvement
Well-led - good
Following our previous comprehensive inspection on 25 September 2019 the practice was rated requires improvement overall, with the key question Safe rated as inadequate and the rating of requires improvement for the other four key questions -effective, caring, responsive and well led. The practice was issued a warning notice for breach of regulation 12(1) Safe care and treatment and a requirement notice for regulation 17(1) Good governance. A follow up inspection to check the practice had taken action in response to the warning notice was undertaken in January 2020 where we observed that all the areas identified in the warning notice had been addressed.
The full reports for previous inspections can be found by selecting the ‘all reports’ link for Olive Medial Practice on our website at www.cqc.org.uk
Why we carried out this inspection
This inspection was a comprehensive inspection to follow up on concerns identified previously. The inspection found significant improvements in the key questions safe and well led and both of these are now rated good. We rated the practice as good for providing effective services, however the population group for working age people (including those recently retired and students) was rated as requires improvement as cervical screening data for 2019/20 remains below target. Caring was rated good however responsive services was rated as requires improvement as published patient feedback was negative.
How we carried out the inspection
Throughout the pandemic CQC has continued to regulate and respond to risk. However, taking into account the circumstances arising as a result of the pandemic, and in order to reduce risk, we have conducted our inspections differently.
This inspection was carried out in a way which enabled us to spend a minimum amount of time on site. This was with consent from the provider and in line with all data protection and information governance requirements.
This included
- Conducting several staff interviews using video conferencing.
- Completing clinical searches on the practice’s patient records system and discussing findings with the provider.
- Reviewing patient records to identify issues and clarify actions taken by the provider.
- Requesting evidence from the provider.
- A short site visit.
Our findings
We based our judgement of the quality of care at this service on a combination of:
- what we found when we inspected
- information from our ongoing monitoring of data about services and
- information from the provider, patients, the public and other organisations.
We have rated this practice as Good overall.
We found that:
- A comprehensive quality improvement plan had been implemented and effective progress and achievement made in improving service delivery in many areas. Governance, risk management, and systems to promote safe and effective care and treatment were in place.
- The improvements observed at our follow up inspection in January 2020 in relation to safeguarding matters had continued to develop and improve to ensure patients identified as at risk were monitored effectively. Patients were appropriately coded on the safeguarding registers and a comprehensive risk assessment process was in place.
- Systems to monitor babies, children and young people non-attendance at appointments both at the GP practice and at secondary care appointments were monitored and responded to.
- Action was taken to ensure test results and allocated clinical tasks were responded to in a timely manner with appropriate action implemented in response to patient safety alerts.
- A system to monitor clinical decision making for those working in advanced clinical roles was established.
- The practice recognised patient dissatisfaction with telephone access and were in the process of negotiating a new telecommunication system to improve access for patients.
- The practice team were working hard to improve performance data such as cervical screening and childhood immunisations. The practice actively sought patient feedback and used this to improve service quality.
- The practice had implemented systems to ensure they provided care in a way that kept patients safe and protected them from avoidable harm. This included implementing and following national and local guidelines to keep people safe throughout the COVID-19 pandemic.
- Staff dealt with patients with kindness and respect and involved them in decisions about their care.
- The practice team were positive and enthusiastic. They told us there had been a cultural shift to inclusive team work and they were all working together to provide a quality service with patients.
Whilst we found no breaches of regulations, the provider should:
- Continue to develop and implement initiatives to improve telephone access and to improve feedback on their experience of the practice.
- Continue to review and improve the records of patients who are carers.
- Continue to monitor and document improvements for cervical screening and immunisations children.
Details of our findings and the evidence supporting our ratings are set out in the evidence tables.
Dr Rosie Benneyworth BM BS BMedSci MRCGP
Chief Inspector of Primary Medical Services and Integrated Care