Background to this inspection
Updated
21 October 2022
SpaMedica Stockton is operated by SpaMedica Ltd. The service opened in October 2020. The service primarily offers cataract surgery and yttrium-aluminium-garnet laser (YAG) capsulotomy services for NHS patients (YAG capsulotomy is a special laser treatment used to improve your vision after cataract surgery). The service did not treat children.
The service is provided over three floors. Clinical services are provided on the ground floor where there is an operating theatre with patient admission, patient ward and patient discharge rooms. The service had several separate rooms used for diagnostic testing, assessment and treatment on the second floor. On the third floor there is a training room, stock room and other ancillary rooms.
The service is registered to provide the following regulated activities:
• Diagnostic and screening procedures
• Surgical procedures
• Treatment of disease, disorder and injury.
The service is managed from a central referral and booking centre based in Bolton, directing patients through choice to various hospitals in the UK. The clinical service is managed by a registered manager and supported by an ophthalmic team which consists of:
• Ophthalmology consultants
• Optometrists
• Registered nurses
• Patient care co-ordinators
• Operating Department Practitioners
• Healthcare technicians
• Administration staff.
SpaMedica Stockton had treated 8135 patients between August 2021 and July 2022.
Updated
21 October 2022
We rated it as outstanding because:
The service had enough staff to care for patients and keep them safe. Staff had training in key skills, understood how to protect patients from abuse, and managed safety well. The service controlled infection risk well. Staff assessed risks to patients, acted on them and kept good care records. They managed medicines well. The service managed safety incidents well and learned lessons from them.
Staff provided good care and treatment, gave patients enough to eat and drink, and gave them pain relief when they needed it. Managers monitored the effectiveness of the service and made sure staff were competent. Staff worked well together for the benefit of patients, supported them to make decisions about their care, and had access to good information. Outcomes for people who use services were consistently better than expected when compared with other similar services.
Staff treated patients with compassion and kindness, respected their privacy and dignity, took account of their individual needs, and helped them understand their conditions. They provided emotional support to patients, families and carers.
The service planned care to meet the needs of local people, took account of patients’ individual needs, made it easy for people to give feedback and delivered in a way to ensure flexibility, choice and continuity. People could access the service when they needed it and did not have to wait too long for treatment.
Leaders ran services well using reliable information systems and supported staff to develop their skills. Staff understood the service’s vision and values, and how to apply them in their work. Staff felt respected, supported and valued. They were focused on the needs of patients receiving care. Staff were clear about their roles and accountabilities. The service engaged well with patients and the community to plan and manage services and all staff were committed to improving services continually.
Updated
21 October 2022
We rated it as outstanding because:
The service had enough staff to care for patients and keep them safe. Staff had training in key skills, understood how to protect patients from abuse, and managed safety well. The service controlled infection risk well. Staff assessed risks to patients, acted on them and kept good care records. They managed medicines well. The service managed safety incidents well and learned lessons from them.
Staff provided good care and treatment, gave patients enough to eat and drink, and gave them pain relief when they needed it. Managers monitored the effectiveness of the service and made sure staff were competent. Staff worked well together for the benefit of patients, supported them to make decisions about their care, and had access to good information. Outcomes for people who use services were consistently better than expected when compared with other similar services
Staff treated patients with compassion and kindness, respected their privacy and dignity, took account of their individual needs, and helped them understand their conditions. They provided emotional support to patients, families and carers.
The service planned care to meet the needs of local people, took account of patients’ individual needs, made it easy for people to give feedback and delivered in a way to ensure flexibility, choice and continuity. People could access the service when they needed it and did not have to wait too long for treatment.
Leaders ran services well using reliable information systems and supported staff to develop their skills. Staff understood the service’s vision and values, and how to apply them in their work. Staff felt respected, supported and valued. They were focused on the needs of patients receiving care. Staff were clear about their roles and accountabilities. The service engaged well with patients and the community to plan and manage services and all staff were committed to improving services continually.