Background to this inspection
Updated
6 March 2021
We carried out this inspection under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 as part of our regulatory functions. This inspection was planned to check whether the provider is meeting the legal requirements and regulations associated with the Health and Social Care Act 2008.
As part of CQC’s response to the coronavirus pandemic we are looking at the preparedness of care homes in relation to infection prevention and control. This was a targeted inspection looking at the infection control and prevention measures the provider has in place.
This inspection took place on 15 February 2021 and was announced.
Updated
6 March 2021
Ashglade is a ‘care home’. People in care homes receive accommodation and nursing or personal care as single package under one contractual agreement. CQC regulates both the premises and the care provided, and both were looked at during this inspection. Ashglade is situated in the London borough of Bromley that provides care for up to 12 people. At the time of the inspection the home was providing care and support to 10 people.
The home had a registered manager in post. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.
This inspection was carried out on 19 March 2018. At our last inspection at the service on 25 May 2017 we found there were not always enough staff to meet people’s needs. At this inspection we found that improvements had been made and there were enough staff on duty to meet people care needs.
People told us they felt safe living at the home. Training records confirmed that staff had received training on safeguarding and there was a whistle-blowing procedure available and staff said they would use it if they needed to. Action was taken to assess any risks to people and risk assessments and care plans included information for staff about action to be taken to minimise the chance of accidents occurring. Medicines were managed appropriately and people were receiving their medicines as prescribed by health care professionals.
Staff had the knowledge and skills required to meet people’s needs. People are supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff support them in the least restrictive way possible; the policies and systems in the service support this practice. People said they enjoyed the meals provided and they could choose what they wanted to eat. People were supported to maintain good health and they had access to healthcare professionals when they needed them.
People needs were assessed before they moved into the home. Care plans and risk assessments included detailed information and guidance for staff about how people’s needs should be met. People’s privacy and dignity was respected. There was a range of activities for people to partake in if they wished to do so. The home had a complaints procedure in place and people said they were confident their complaints would be listened to and acted on.
The provider recognised the importance of monitoring the quality of the service. They sought the views of people, their relatives and staff through satisfaction surveys. The registered manager worked with other care providers and professional bodies to make improvements at the home. Staff said they enjoyed working at the home and they received good support from the registered manager. There was an out of hours on call system in operation that ensured that management support and advice was always available to them when they needed it.