The Care Quality Commission
  • Doctor
  • GP practice

Park House Surgery

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

6 Park Street, Bagshot, Surrey, GU19 5AQ (01276) 476333

Provided and run by:
Park House Surgery

All Inspections

6 July 2023

During a monthly review of our data

We carried out a review of the data available to us about Park House Surgery on 6 July 2023. We have not found evidence that we need to carry out an inspection or reassess our rating at this stage.

This could change at any time if we receive new information. We will continue to monitor data about this service.

If you have concerns about Park House Surgery, you can give feedback on this service.

5 December 2019

During an annual regulatory review

We reviewed the information available to us about Park House Surgery on 5 December 2019. We did not find evidence of significant changes to the quality of service being provided since the last inspection. As a result, we decided not to inspect the surgery at this time. We will continue to monitor this information about this service throughout the year and may inspect the surgery when we see evidence of potential changes.

8 August 2018

During a routine inspection

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at Park House Surgery on 8 August 2018. Overall the practice is rated as good.

The key questions are rated as:

Are services safe? – Good

Are services effective? – Good

Are services caring? – Good

Are services responsive? – Good

Are services well-led? - Good

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at Park House Surgery on 8 August 2018 under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 as part of our regulatory functions. The inspection was planned to check whether the provider is meeting the legal requirements and regulations associated with the Health and Social Care Act 2008, to look at the overall quality of the service, and to provide a rating for the service under the Care Act 2014.

At this inspection we found:

  • The practice had clear systems to manage risk so that safety incidents were less likely to happen. When incidents did happen, the practice learned from them and improved their processes.
  • The practice used their knowledge of the local community and patient population to deliver high quality and person centred care.
  • The practice routinely reviewed the effectiveness and appropriateness of the care it provided. It ensured that care and treatment was delivered according to evidence based guidelines.
  • There was a strong focus on improvement at all levels of the organisation.
  • Staff involved and treated patients with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.
  • Data from the Quality and Outcomes Framework (QOF) showed the results for practice management of patients with long-term conditions were good.
  • Results from the national GP patient survey showed patients were treated with compassion, dignity and respect and were involved in their care and decisions about their treatment.
  • Patients said they were able to book an appointment that suited their needs. Pre-bookable, on the day appointments and home visits were available. Urgent appointments for those with enhanced needs were also provided the same day.
  • The practice was equipped to treat patients and meet their needs.

The areas where the provider should make improvements are:

  • Continue to review and improve ways to increase uptake for cervical screening.
  • Continue to review and improve ways to increase the number of health assessments for patients with a learning disability.
  • Continue to update policies and procedures
  • Continue to review and improve systems for recording information including risk assessments, alerts received and tracking of prescriptions.

Professor Steve Field CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGPChief Inspector of General Practice

Please refer to the detailed report and the evidence tables for further information.